Search Climate Insights Directory

The document details regulatory actions, litigation, and legislative updates across several countries focusing on AI, data privacy, and online safety. It also reviews four reports on algorithmic recommender systems, highlighting risks such as the amplification of harmful content and the prioritisation of short-term engagement over long-term user value.

The document is divided into two main sections: a report on regulatory developments in Canada, Ireland, the UK, and the US regarding online streaming, safety codes, advertising, and AI; and a snapshot of literature on climate disinformation. The latter highlights the shift from outright climate denial to 'delay discourses' and 'culture wars' frames, the role of fossil fuel interests in seeding misinformation, and the impact of fringe websites and algorithmic amplification on digital platforms.

A letter from the Centre for Environmental Rights to the IPP Office of the Department of Energy requesting an update on the commercial and financial close deadlines for the Thabametsi and Khanyisa coal-fired power stations, noting that the deadlines of 2 and 3 November 2019 have expired.

A letter from the Centre for Environmental Rights to the IPP Office of the Department of Energy requesting updates on the commercial and financial close deadlines for the Thabametsi and Khanyisa coal-fired power station projects, while asserting that neither project is currently capable of reaching such close due to outstanding licenses and pending litigation.

The document examines how the transition from regulating landings to regulating catches under the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) landing obligation complicates the monitoring of TACs. It highlights that 'top-up' calculations—adding previously discarded amounts to landings advice—are hindered by missing scientific data on discards, a lack of transparency regarding the European Commission's methodology, and the absence of official records for proposed top-up quantities. The author argues that without accessible data on fleet-segment discards and clear methodology, civil society cannot verify if TACs align with scientific advice or the MSY objective.