Search Climate Insights Directory

The document argues that mancozeb and its metabolite ethylene thiourea (ETU) pose unacceptable risks to human health and the environment, citing a 2021 European Union ban and deficiencies in Canada's regulatory oversight. The requesters claim the PMRA has failed to implement its own 2020 risk mitigation measures, ignored critical biomonitoring data showing widespread ETU exposure in Canadians, and relied on outdated US water monitoring data to underestimate cancer risks. They specifically highlight risks of endocrine disruption, reproductive toxicity, and harm to non-target arthropods, birds, and aquatic organisms, demanding a special review and the suspension of product renewals.

This filing notice and updated practice note, submitted by the Centre for Environmental Rights (CER) on December 8, 2020, outlines an appeal in the High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria). The appeal challenges a Water Tribunal decision that dismissed a previous appeal against the granting of a water use licence (WUL) to Atha-Africa Ventures (Pty) Ltd by the Department of Water and Sanitation.

The Vaal Environmental Justice Alliance (VEJA) and groundWork have appealed a decision by the National Air Quality Officer (NAQO) to grant ArcelorMittal South Africa (AMSA) postponements and alternative emission limits for Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S) at its Vanderbijlpark facility. The appellants argue that the granted limits are unlawfully weaker than existing plant standards and that AMSA's history of environmental non-compliance makes it unfit to receive such leniency.

This document is a Notice of Appeal filed in the High Court of South Africa by the Endangered Wild Federation and the Federation for a Sustainable Environment. The appellants challenge a May 22, 2018, decision by the Water Tribunal regarding a water use licence granted to Atha-Africa Ventures (Pty) Ltd. The appeal is based on eleven grounds, primarily arguing that the Water Tribunal ignored critical environmental data, failed to apply the precautionary principle, and overlooked jurisdictional requirements regarding landowner consent and financial security for post-closure water treatment.