Search Climate Insights Directory

Search syntax
intitle:
The document title intitle:"climate education"
ispublisher:
The publishing organization ispublisher:CAPE
insummary:
Summary and key findings insummary:"conflict of interest"
hasconcept:
Climate tags, frame/perspective and analysis type hasconcept:"Climate Justice"
geography:
Regions the document covers or discusses geography:Canada
doctype:
Document type doctype:report
lang:
Document language, as an ISO code lang:fr
cidid:
One record, by its directory id cidid:iisd-000297
Analysis TypePolicy process evaluation
Clear all

1 result

  • The study examines the co-decision procedure involving the European Commission, the European Parliament (EP), and the Council of the EU. It finds that informal processes, such as coalition-building and the leadership of the French Presidency, exerted more influence on the final policy outcome than formal rules. While the EP pushed for stricter social and environmental sustainability criteria, the final agreement largely reflected the economic and rational interests of the Commission and the Council, with the Council emerging as the most dominant actor.

    AI-generated

    This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

    Themes: biofuelgreenhouse gasclimate policy
    Stockholm Environment Institute

    Document type: Research paper

    Regions: European Union
Showing 1–1 of 1 document