Search Climate Insights Directory

Search syntax
intitle:
The document title intitle:"climate education"
ispublisher:
The publishing organization ispublisher:CAPE
insummary:
Summary and key findings insummary:"conflict of interest"
hasconcept:
Climate tags, frame/perspective and analysis type hasconcept:"Climate Justice"
geography:
Regions the document covers or discusses geography:Canada
doctype:
Document type doctype:report
lang:
Document language, as an ISO code lang:fr
cidid:
One record, by its directory id cidid:iisd-000297
Analysis TypeFiscal modeling
Clear all

3 results

  • The document presents three implementation pathways (low, medium, and high levels) for a UBIG in South Africa, arguing that such a grant would reduce poverty and stimulate economic growth. It details the fiscal impact, suggesting that while gross costs are high, net costs are lower due to VAT returns and proposed progressive taxes, including a social security tax and wealth taxes.

    AI-generated

    This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

    Document type: Fact sheet

  • The document outlines three financial pathways (low, medium, and high effort) to implement a Universal Basic Income Guarantee (UBIG) for South Africans aged 18 to 59. Using a simulation model developed with Applied Development Research Solutions (ADRS), the Institute for Economic Justice (IEJ) argues that a UBIG is fiscally sustainable and would stimulate economic growth, reduce poverty, and lower unemployment. The analysis suggests that while gross costs are high, the net cost is significantly reduced by VAT returns and a proposed social security tax (SST). Funding mechanisms include progressive wealth taxes on the top 1% of the population, luxury VAT, and the reduction of tax subsidies for pensions and medical aid.

    AI-generated

    This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

    Document type: Fact sheet

    Regions: South Africa
  • The Institute for Economic Justice (IEJ) identifies four critical failures in South Africa's tax management: significant revenue shortfalls (approximately R50bn in 2018), the undermining of the South African Revenue Service (SARS) by corruption and state capture, a tax mix that under-taxes wealth and corporate income, and high levels of illicit financial flows. The brief proposes increasing Personal Income Tax (PIT) and Corporate Income Tax (CIT) rates, introducing a permanent net wealth tax (0.5%-2.5%), and expanding VAT zero-rating for 23 categories of essential goods to support low-income households. To recover lost revenue, the IEJ recommends revitalizing SARS through a Presidential Commission, reintroducing a special priority crime unit, and increasing transparency of corporate and offshore structures. These measures are intended to fund a fiscal stimulus, public employment guarantees, and social services to enhance job creation.

    AI-generated

    This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

    Themes: tax policy

    Document type: Policy brief

    Regions: South Africa
Showing 1–3 of 3 documents