Search Climate Insights Directory

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 provide significant financial and environmental gains for New Hampshire. It claims that by 2030, the average New Hampshire household will be $2,500 richer due to gas savings, and the state will see 3,200 new jobs. Environmentally, the standards are credited with eliminating global warming emissions nearly equal to those generated by providing electricity to the entire state of New Hampshire.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA provide significant financial and environmental benefits to New Jersey, including $750 million in savings to date and the projected creation of 16,000 new jobs by 2030.

The document argues that federal fuel economy and emissions standards set by the EPA and NHTSA provide significant benefits to New York, including $1.8 billion in savings to date and projected household gains of $1,950 by 2030. It highlights that these standards reduce global warming emissions by an amount equivalent to the electricity needs of New York City and support job creation within the auto industry.

Federal fuel economy and vehicle emissions standards have saved North Carolina $1.2 billion to date and are projected to make the average household $3,300 richer by 2030. These standards are expected to create 22,500 new jobs in the state and eliminate global warming emissions equivalent to more than those produced by providing electricity to Charlotte.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 benefit North Dakota by reducing fuel costs, creating jobs, and lowering emissions. It highlights that by 2030, the average North Dakota household will be $3,300 richer due to gas savings. To date, the state has saved $130 million, and the standards have eliminated emissions equivalent to the electricity needs of Bismarck.

Federal fuel economy and vehicle emissions standards have saved Ohio $1.2 billion to date and are projected to make the average Ohio household $2,200 richer by 2030. These standards are expected to create 29,700 new jobs in the state and eliminate global warming emissions nearly equivalent to those from providing electricity to Columbus.

The document argues that federal fuel economy and global warming emissions standards set by the EPA and NHTSA benefit Oklahoma through significant household savings, job creation, and emissions reductions. It highlights that by 2030, the average Oklahoma household will be $3,100 richer due to gas savings outweighing the upfront cost of more efficient vehicles. To date, Oklahoma has saved $440 million, and the standards are projected to create 2,300 new jobs in the state. Environmentally, the standards eliminate global warming emissions in Oklahoma equivalent to half of those produced by providing electricity to Tulsa.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 provide significant financial and environmental advantages to Oregon. By 2030, the average Oregon household is projected to be $3,300 richer due to gas savings. To date, Oregon has saved $460 million, and the standards are expected to support 8,500 new jobs in the state. Environmentally, the standards eliminate global warming emissions in Oregon equivalent to twice those produced by providing electricity to Eugene.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA provide significant financial and environmental benefits to Pennsylvania, including $1.2 billion in savings to date and the projected creation of 26,400 new jobs by 2030.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 provide significant financial and environmental advantages to Rhode Island. It highlights that these standards reduce global warming emissions, lower fuel costs for households, and stimulate local economic growth and job creation.

The fact sheet details the positive impacts of EPA and NHTSA light-duty vehicle standards on South Carolina, highlighting fuel savings, job creation, and emissions reductions. It asserts that these standards increase household wealth and support the auto industry by providing investment certainty.

The document argues that federal fuel economy and emissions standards set by the EPA and NHTSA provide significant financial savings, job growth, and emissions reductions for South Dakota, projecting that the average household will be $2,800 richer by 2030.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA benefit Tennessee by reducing fuel costs, creating jobs, and lowering emissions. It projects that by 2030, the average Tennessee household will be $3,150 richer due to gas savings and that the state has already saved $800 million. Nationally, these standards are credited with increasing GDP by up to $30 billion and creating 650,000 full-time jobs by 2030.

The document asserts that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 benefit Texas through fuel savings, job creation, and emissions reductions. By 2030, the average Texas household is projected to be $3,250 richer due to gas savings outweighing the upfront cost of more efficient vehicles. To date, Texas has saved $3 billion, and the standards are expected to create 24,400 new jobs in the state. Environmentally, the standards eliminate global warming emissions in Texas nearly equivalent to those generated by providing electricity to Houston.

The document outlines the positive impacts of EPA and NHTSA light-duty vehicle standards on Utah, highlighting projected household savings of $3,050 by 2030, the creation of 4,700 new jobs, and the elimination of global warming emissions equivalent to half of those produced by providing electricity to Salt Lake City.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA benefit Vermont by reducing gasoline consumption, lowering household spending at the pump, and stimulating economic growth. It highlights that by 2030, the average Vermont household will save $2,850, and the state has already saved $80 million to date.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA provide significant financial savings, job growth, and emissions reductions for Virginia, warning that rolling back these protections would jeopardize this progress.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA provide significant financial and environmental benefits to Washington state, including millions in fuel savings and job creation, while reducing global warming emissions.

The document asserts that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 benefit West Virginia through fuel savings, job creation, and emissions reductions. It claims that by 2030, the average West Virginia household will be $3,500 richer due to gas savings outweighing the upfront cost of more efficient vehicles. To date, the state has saved $220 million, and the standards are projected to create 2,300 new jobs in the state. Environmentally, the document states that these standards eliminate global warming emissions in West Virginia equivalent to more than those generated by providing electricity to Charleston.

The document argues that federal light-duty vehicle standards set by the EPA and NHTSA in 2012 provide significant financial and environmental advantages to Wisconsin. By 2030, the average Wisconsin household is projected to be $2,400 richer due to gas savings outweighing the upfront cost of more efficient vehicles. To date, Wisconsin has saved $670 million, and the standards have eliminated global warming emissions equivalent to half of those produced by providing electricity to Milwaukee. Nationally, these standards are projected to increase GDP by up to $30 billion and create 650,000 full-time jobs by 2030.