No Food Left Behind Part 1: Underutilized Produce Ripe for Alternative Markets

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The report analyzes on-farm losses of specialty crops in the US, finding significant waste in fresh produce like romaine lettuce (56%) and tomatoes (40%) during the 2017-2018 season. It identifies drivers of loss including strict retail cosmetic standards, labor shortages, and unpredictable weather. The document argues that improving supply chain transparency, diversifying markets (e.g., frozen and canned), and reforming buyer-seller contracts could reduce environmental impacts and address food insecurity.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • For the 2017-2018 growing season, measured losses at harvest for specific crops varied significantly: fresh romaine lettuce had the highest loss at 56%, followed by fresh tomatoes at 40%, fresh peaches at 39%, and processing potatoes at 2%.
  • On-farm food loss is primarily driven by a combination of weather, labor availability, and market conditions. Retailers' strict cosmetic and quality standards often lead to the culling of edible produce that is misshapen, overripe, or damaged.
  • Life-cycle assessments indicate that processing peaches have the highest direct water use per kilogram of product and are tied with potatoes as the most carbon-intensive crop to produce per kilogram.
  • Growers often view on-farm loss as more resource-efficient than downstream waste, as produce left on the farm avoids the additional labor, refrigeration, and transportation energy embedded in the supply chain.
  • Current food recovery methods include diverting culls into value-added processing (juicing, drying, freezing) and donating to food banks, though farmers often find that tax credits do not fully cover the variable costs of labor and logistics for donations.
  • The report suggests that the US could increase fruit and vegetable availability without increasing land conversion or water use by improving transparency, shifting consumer perceptions of 'ugly' or processed produce, and adopting 'whole-farm purchasing' models.

Cite the original document

APA
WWF International (n.d.). No Food Left Behind Part 1: Underutilized Produce Ripe for Alternative Markets. https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/329/1o0so2isvb_WWF_NoFoodLeftBehind820_2.pdf
Chicago
WWF International. No Food Left Behind Part 1: Underutilized Produce Ripe for Alternative Markets. n.d. https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/329/1o0so2isvb_WWF_NoFoodLeftBehind820_2.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=WWF International |title=No Food Left Behind Part 1: Underutilized Produce Ripe for Alternative Markets |url=https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/329/1o0so2isvb_WWF_NoFoodLeftBehind820_2.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{wwfinternationalndfood, author = {{WWF International}}, title = {{No Food Left Behind Part 1: Underutilized Produce Ripe for Alternative Markets}}, institution = {WWF International}, url = {https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/329/1o0so2isvb_WWF_NoFoodLeftBehind820_2.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated