Nature-Based Solutions and Landscape and Jurisdictional Approaches: Complementary Means to Achieve Lasting Benefits

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document clarifies the distinctions and synergies between Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) and Landscape and Jurisdictional Approaches (LA/JAs). While NbS are typically project-level interventions that leverage nature for societal benefits, LA/JAs are broader socioecological management strategies designed to align multiple stakeholders and goals at a landscape or political scale. The briefing argues that NbS are most effective and durable when embedded within LA/JAs, which provide the necessary governance, long-term planning, and policy alignment to scale impacts and meet global commitments such as the Global Biodiversity Framework and the Paris Agreement.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Nature-based solutions (NbS) and landscape and jurisdictional approaches (LA/JAs) are distinct but complementary place-based strategies. NbS are generally smaller, project-level interventions focused on specific societal challenges, whereas LA/JAs are broader management strategies that align multiple stakeholders to achieve sustainability at scale.
  • Jurisdictional Approaches (JAs) are a specific subset of landscape approaches where the area is defined by a political boundary and involves high levels of government participation, which enhances accountability, policy coordination, and data collection.
  • The integration of NbS within LA/JAs creates a synergistic effect: LA/JAs provide the governance and policy framework that makes NbS more durable and transformational, while NbS serve as the specific interventions that deliver the tangible benefits within the broader landscape strategy.
  • Combining these approaches helps stakeholders meet specific international and corporate nature commitments, including the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), the Paris Agreement, the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), and the Science Based Targets Network (SBTN).

Cite the original document

APA
WWF International (2025). Nature-Based Solutions and Landscape and Jurisdictional Approaches: Complementary Means to Achieve Lasting Benefits. https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/631/1nsjzhwyrw_25_2381_NBS_and_LA_JA_Discussion_Document_FINAL_052025_DD.pdf
Chicago
WWF International. Nature-Based Solutions and Landscape and Jurisdictional Approaches: Complementary Means to Achieve Lasting Benefits. 2025. https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/631/1nsjzhwyrw_25_2381_NBS_and_LA_JA_Discussion_Document_FINAL_052025_DD.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=WWF International |title=Nature-Based Solutions and Landscape and Jurisdictional Approaches: Complementary Means to Achieve Lasting Benefits |date=4 June 2025 |url=https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/631/1nsjzhwyrw_25_2381_NBS_and_LA_JA_Discussion_Document_FINAL_052025_DD.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{wwfinternational2025naturebased, author = {{WWF International}}, title = {{Nature-Based Solutions and Landscape and Jurisdictional Approaches: Complementary Means to Achieve Lasting Benefits}}, institution = {WWF International}, year = {2025}, month = jun, url = {https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/631/1nsjzhwyrw_25_2381_NBS_and_LA_JA_Discussion_Document_FINAL_052025_DD.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated