Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document details the creation of global country-level water stress projections by aggregating sub-catchment data using a spatially weighted methodology. It utilizes IPCC AR5 data to model three scenarios—optimistic, business-as-usual, and pessimistic—across three time horizons (2020, 2030, 2040). The rankings are designed to help investors, companies, and governments benchmark national water risks and prioritize adaptation. A 2040 business-as-usual ranking identifies several Middle Eastern countries, including Bahrain, Kuwait, and Qatar, as having the highest water stress scores of 5.00.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The analysis uses a spatially weighted aggregation methodology to convert sub-catchment scale projections to a national scale, using gridded water-withdrawal datasets as weights to prioritize areas with the highest human demand.
  • Water stress is quantified as the ratio of total water withdrawals to available renewable surface water, with scores ranging from 0 to 5. A score between 4 and 5 is categorized as 'Extremely high', representing a withdrawal-to-available water ratio of over 80%.
  • The projections are based on three combined IPCC scenarios: 'optimistic' (RCP4.5 and SSP2), 'business-as-usual' (RCP8.5 and SSP2), and 'pessimistic' (RCP8.5 and SSP3).
  • Under the 2040 business-as-usual scenario, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, San Marino, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and Palestine all share the highest possible water stress rank with a score of 5.00 across all sectors.
  • The country-level indicators have limitations, as they average away significant sub-national variations in countries such as Brazil, China, and the United States, and do not account for national governance or investment structures.

Cite the original document

APA
Luo, T., Young, R., & Reig, P. (2015). AQUEDUCT PROJECTED WATER STRESS COUNTRY RANKINGS. World Resources Institute. https://wriorg.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/aqueduct-water-stress-country-rankings-technical-note.pdf
Chicago
Luo, Tianyi, Robert Young, and Paul Reig. AQUEDUCT PROJECTED WATER STRESS COUNTRY RANKINGS. World Resources Institute, 2015. https://wriorg.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/aqueduct-water-stress-country-rankings-technical-note.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Luo |first1=Tianyi |last2=Young |first2=Robert |last3=Reig |first3=Paul |title=AQUEDUCT PROJECTED WATER STRESS COUNTRY RANKINGS |publisher=World Resources Institute |date=August 2015 |url=https://wriorg.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/aqueduct-water-stress-country-rankings-technical-note.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{luo2015aqueduct, author = {Luo, Tianyi and Young, Robert and Reig, Paul}, title = {{AQUEDUCT PROJECTED WATER STRESS COUNTRY RANKINGS}}, institution = {World Resources Institute}, year = {2015}, month = aug, url = {https://wriorg.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/aqueduct-water-stress-country-rankings-technical-note.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated