5 Do’s and Don’ts for the Green Climate Fund

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The World Resources Institute (WRI) outlines five 'do's and don'ts' for the Green Climate Fund (GCF) Board to ensure the fund effectively delivers resources for climate mitigation and adaptation. These recommendations cover investment criteria, financial risk management, accreditation of entities, results management, and the proposal approval process, emphasizing the need for a high risk appetite and a balance between top-down and bottom-up proposals to support international climate action ahead of COP 21.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The GCF Board should implement robust funding criteria linked to desired results and ensure that benefits extend beyond the entities channeling resources to other parts of the funding value chain to remove investment barriers.
  • To incentivize ambitious climate-resilient investments, the GCF should maintain a higher appetite for financial risk than other investors, while avoiding the management of risks that can be more cost-effectively handled by channeling or executing entities.
  • The accreditation process for entities channeling resources should be broad and immediate, prioritizing the most competent institutions—including those in developing countries—while maintaining standards appropriate to the activity's risk level.
  • The Fund's results management should focus on ambitious, scalable, and replicable goals based on country priorities, avoiding overly detailed monitoring and evaluation systems in the initial phase in favor of iterative learning.
  • The proposal approval process should balance top-down strategic identification with bottom-up opportunities and use competitive processes to drive innovation, using scoring tools as support rather than as a substitute for Board judgment.

Cite the original document

APA
World Resources Institute (2014). 5 Do’s and Don’ts for the Green Climate Fund. https://www.wri.org/insights/5-dos-and-donts-green-climate-fund
Chicago
World Resources Institute. 5 Do’s and Don’ts for the Green Climate Fund. 2014. https://www.wri.org/insights/5-dos-and-donts-green-climate-fund.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=World Resources Institute |title=5 Do’s and Don’ts for the Green Climate Fund |date=19 May 2014 |url=https://www.wri.org/insights/5-dos-and-donts-green-climate-fund |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{worldresourcesinstitute2014dos, author = {{World Resources Institute}}, title = {{5 Do’s and Don’ts for the Green Climate Fund}}, institution = {World Resources Institute}, year = {2014}, month = may, url = {https://www.wri.org/insights/5-dos-and-donts-green-climate-fund}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated