Summary
This World Resources Institute working paper, the eighth in a series, reviews Readiness Preparation Proposals (R-PPs) and National Programme Documents (NPDs) submitted to the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) and the UN-REDD Programme. The analysis focuses on how REDD+ Country Participants address forest governance, transparency, accountability, participation, and coordination during the readiness phase.
Key insights
- The working paper evaluates the integration of forest governance principles—specifically transparency, accountability, participation, and coordination—within the R-PPs and NPDs submitted by countries to the FCPF and UN-REDD Programme to determine if major governance challenges driving forest loss are identified.
- This specific update analyzes R-PPs from the Central African Republic and Colombia for formal FCPF Participants Committee consideration, as well as Nigeria's NPD for UN-REDD Policy Board funding consideration. Draft R-PPs from Guatemala and Mozambique were submitted for informal review but were not analyzed in this paper.
Cite the original document
- APA
- World Resources Institute (n.d.). Getting Ready. https://www.wri.org/research/getting-ready
- Chicago
- World Resources Institute. Getting Ready. n.d. https://www.wri.org/research/getting-ready.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |author=World Resources Institute |title=Getting Ready |url=https://www.wri.org/research/getting-ready |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{worldresourcesinstitutendgetting, author = {{World Resources Institute}}, title = {{Getting Ready}}, institution = {World Resources Institute}, url = {https://www.wri.org/research/getting-ready}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated