Browse all documents

Ramping Up Governance of the Global Environmental Commons: What Do Theory and History Tell Us?

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This research paper examines the governance of global environmental commons through the lens of public goods theory and historical outcomes. It argues that while global governance has seen uneven results, ramping up effectiveness requires strengthening national coalitions, leveraging technological innovation, and reinforcing the narrative of sustainable development.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The history of global environmental governance shows mixed results, with significant successes in ozone protection via the Montreal Protocol and the Kigali Amendment's phase-down of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), while efforts to manage ocean fisheries, biodiversity, deforestation, climate change, and chemical pollution have varied.
  • Improving the governance of the global environmental commons depends on several strategic actions: enhancing the legitimizing narrative of sustainable development, building stronger national coalitions to support international agreements, supporting technological innovation, improving international architecture, and increasing implementation capacity and policy quality in developing countries.
  • Several factors currently facilitate the strengthening of national coalitions—which are often composed of NGOs, industry, and political leaders and framed by the 2015 UN Sustainable Development Goals—including the ICT revolution, new environmental measurement technologies, lower costs for sustainable development pathways, and dedicated champions for climate and environmental issues.
  • The rise of global nationalist movements acts as a counter-trend to the progress of environmental governance by challenging the fundamental concept of global governance.

Cite the original document

APA
World Resources Institute (n.d.). Ramping Up Governance of the Global Environmental Commons: What Do Theory and History Tell Us? https://www.wri.org/research/ramping-governance-global-environmental-commons-what-do-theory-and-history-tell-us
Chicago
World Resources Institute. Ramping Up Governance of the Global Environmental Commons: What Do Theory and History Tell Us? n.d. https://www.wri.org/research/ramping-governance-global-environmental-commons-what-do-theory-and-history-tell-us.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=World Resources Institute |title=Ramping Up Governance of the Global Environmental Commons: What Do Theory and History Tell Us? |url=https://www.wri.org/research/ramping-governance-global-environmental-commons-what-do-theory-and-history-tell-us |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{worldresourcesinstitutendramping, author = {{World Resources Institute}}, title = {{Ramping Up Governance of the Global Environmental Commons: What Do Theory and History Tell Us?}}, institution = {World Resources Institute}, url = {https://www.wri.org/research/ramping-governance-global-environmental-commons-what-do-theory-and-history-tell-us}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated