Paving the Way: Maximizing the Value of Private Finance in Infrastructure
Summary
The report argues that a global infrastructure investment gap of approximately US$2 trillion per annum exists, as total needs reach US$3 trillion while private investment stands at US$1 trillion. It proposes a framework to attract private capital by establishing prioritized project pipelines, building government transactional capacity, and managing public perceptions. The document analyzes various financing instruments, including commercial debt, capital markets bonds, and infrastructure funds, while highlighting the role of multilateral development banks in risk mitigation. Case studies from India, Australia, Canada, and the US illustrate the impact of realistic forecasting, judicial independence, and innovative funding models like availability payments.
Key insights
- There is a significant global financing gap for infrastructure, with annual investment needs estimated at US$3 trillion (approximately 5% of global GDP), while private investment is estimated at US$1 trillion, leaving a gap of US$2 trillion per annum.
- Private finance is viable for critical infrastructure—assets that are monopolistic or safety-critical—provided that the implications of failure, such as service erosion or complete shutdown, are explicitly managed through robust financing and regulatory regimes.
- The length of an infrastructure concession should be determined by consumer protection, debt repayment periods, and investor return requirements rather than the physical life of the asset.
- Successful attraction of private finance requires a program of prioritized opportunities characterized by clear political support, a credible timetable, and a transparent procurement framework to reduce frictions like long lead times.
- A lack of commercial and transactional expertise within government bodies can hinder intelligent procurement and the ability to achieve best value for money, necessitating dedicated, well-trained procurement teams.
- Multilateral development banks (MDBs) provide essential support beyond direct funding, including political risk cover, independent mediation, and capacity building through initiatives like the MP3IC program.
- Public perception can either facilitate or block projects; resistance is higher for social infrastructure and projects introducing tolls to previously free roads, requiring transparent value-for-money analysis and stakeholder engagement.
- The global economic crisis led to a retrenchment by commercial banks from long-term lending, resulting in higher pricing, shortened loan maturities (such as 'mini perms'), and a shift toward 'club bank' arrangements over traditional syndication.
- The infrastructure bond market suffered a 'vicious circle' due to the collapse of monoline insurers, who provided the credit enhancement and transactional skills necessary for low-investment-grade projects to attract capital market investors.
- Infrastructure funds are evolving toward greater specialization by asset type, geography (with a shift toward BRIC countries), and the emergence of retail investment, moving away from general private equity-type models.
- Pension funds are a natural fit for infrastructure due to long-term liabilities, but investment is hindered by geographic mismatches, a lack of expertise among trustees/advisors, and the illiquidity of assets.
- Governments are increasingly acting as lenders of last resort through direct co-lending, debt guarantees, and the establishment of state-owned infrastructure banks to stimulate private finance during crises.
Cite the original document
- APA
- World Economic Forum (2010). Paving the Way: Maximizing the Value of Private Finance in Infrastructure. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_IV_PavingTheWay_Report_2010.pdf
- Chicago
- World Economic Forum. Paving the Way: Maximizing the Value of Private Finance in Infrastructure. 2010. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_IV_PavingTheWay_Report_2010.pdf.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |author=World Economic Forum |title=Paving the Way: Maximizing the Value of Private Finance in Infrastructure |date=August 2010 |url=http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_IV_PavingTheWay_Report_2010.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{worldeconomicforum2010paving, author = {{World Economic Forum}}, title = {{Paving the Way: Maximizing the Value of Private Finance in Infrastructure}}, institution = {World Economic Forum}, year = {2010}, month = aug, url = {http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_IV_PavingTheWay_Report_2010.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated