Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document assesses the fragmented landscape of global technology governance in 2019, highlighting a lack of coherence across different levels of government and sectors. It identifies five priority cross-cutting issues—privacy and security, interoperability, access and inclusion, employment and skills, and environmental sustainability—and proposes a framework for governments, industry, and civil society to collaborate through agile, human-centered policy-making to overcome barriers like digital protectionism and expertise gaps.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Global technology governance is currently underdeveloped and fragmented, characterized as a "patchwork of approaches" with a significant lack of coherence both vertically (across government and organizational layers) and horizontally (across countries and disciplines).
  • The rapid pace and convergence of Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies create a 'pacing problem' and 'policy decay,' where traditional regulatory cycles cannot keep up with technological diffusion, leading to governance that falls behind new business models.
  • Five priority cross-cutting governance issues have been identified across multiple technology domains, including AI, drones, precision medicine, IoT, autonomous vehicles, and blockchain: privacy and security, interoperability, access and inclusion, employment and skills development, and environmental sustainability.
  • There is a critical tension between individual data privacy and public security, with some governments implementing 'backdoors' or banning encrypted services like WhatsApp and Signal to prevent 'law-free zones' for criminal activity.
  • Digital protectionism and restrictive data policies have risen steadily since 2006, creating a 'prisoners dilemma' where nations prioritize control over infrastructure and data, thereby limiting global economic output.
  • Emerging technologies pose significant environmental risks, such as the high energy cost of training NLP machine learning models—comparable to four lifetimes of car emissions—and the energy-intensive nature of cryptocurrency mining.
  • The document advocates for 'agile governance,' which employs systems and design thinking to create inclusive, human-centered policies that can be rapidly iterated and updated to match the speed of technological change.
  • A significant 'expertise gap' exists within governments, where policy leaders often lack a deep understanding of the attributes and impacts of emerging technologies, hindering the development of successful governance protocols.

Cite the original document

APA
World Economic Forum (2019). White Paper Global Technology Governance. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Technology_Governance.pdf
Chicago
World Economic Forum. White Paper Global Technology Governance. 2019. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Technology_Governance.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=World Economic Forum |title=White Paper Global Technology Governance |date=October 2019 |url=http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Technology_Governance.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{worldeconomicforum2019white, author = {{World Economic Forum}}, title = {{White Paper Global Technology Governance}}, institution = {World Economic Forum}, year = {2019}, month = oct, url = {http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Technology_Governance.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated