Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document highlights the critical role of soil health in the US food system and the negative impacts of decades of short-sighted farm policies. It details the economic and environmental costs of soil erosion and degradation, including water pollution and increased vulnerability to extreme weather. The brief proposes a transition to practices such as cover cropping and no-till farming to sequester carbon and improve resilience, while recommending specific policy shifts in financial incentives, research funding, and technical assistance.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • US agricultural land suffers from severe soil erosion, with estimates indicating a loss of more than 3 trillion pounds of soil annually.
  • Agricultural nitrogen pollution imposes a significant economic burden on the United States, costing approximately $157 billion per year and creating environmental hazards like the Gulf of Mexico "dead zone".
  • Degraded soil increases the financial risk to taxpayers through the federal crop insurance program, which paid $52 billion for flood- and drought-related claims between 2009 and 2018.
  • The US agriculture sector is a notable source of greenhouse gases, accounting for roughly 9 percent of the nation's heat-trapping emissions, though it offers potential for carbon sequestration through improved soil management.
  • Effective soil health practices—including cover crops, diversified rotations, perennial planting, low- or no-till systems, composting, and improved grazing—can reduce erosion and increase carbon storage, yet adoption remains low; for instance, fewer than 4 percent of cropland acres used cover crops as of 2017.
  • There is significant support among farmers for policy changes; a 2018 poll of farmers in seven states showed that 75% support federal incentives to reduce soil loss and runoff, and 70% would prefer candidates favoring sustainable agriculture.
  • Public sector spending for food and agricultural research saw a 20 percent inflation-adjusted decline between 2008 and 2013, leaving a gap in urgently needed ecological research for soil health.

Cite the original document

APA
Union of Concerned Scientists (2019). Safeguarding Soil. https://www.ucs.org/sites/default/files/2019-12/safeguarding-soil-policy-brief-2019-web-final.pdf
Chicago
Union of Concerned Scientists. Safeguarding Soil. 2019. https://www.ucs.org/sites/default/files/2019-12/safeguarding-soil-policy-brief-2019-web-final.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Union of Concerned Scientists |title=Safeguarding Soil |date=November 2019 |url=https://www.ucs.org/sites/default/files/2019-12/safeguarding-soil-policy-brief-2019-web-final.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{unionofconcernedscientists2019safeguarding, author = {{Union of Concerned Scientists}}, title = {{Safeguarding Soil}}, institution = {Union of Concerned Scientists}, year = {2019}, month = nov, url = {https://www.ucs.org/sites/default/files/2019-12/safeguarding-soil-policy-brief-2019-web-final.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated