Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The report examines the environmental and economic impacts of heavy-duty truck fuel efficiency in the U.S., arguing that standards increasing efficiency by 40% by 2025 would save billions in costs and reduce millions of metric tons of emissions.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Heavy-duty trucks are a major source of fuel consumption in the U.S., using more than 21 billion gallons of fuel annually to move freight, with consumer goods accounting for over one-third of that use.
  • Stronger fuel economy standards could increase the average fuel economy of trucks shipping goods from 6.3 mpg to 10.7 mpg by 2025, reducing annual fuel use by nearly 9 billion gallons.
  • Implementing these stronger standards would prevent over 110 million metric tons of global warming emissions annually, which is equivalent to the emissions of 30 coal-fired power plants.
  • The economic benefits include annual fuel cost savings of over $30 billion, which could potentially reduce freight rates by nearly 10% and provide U.S. households with an additional $135 per year if half the savings are passed on.
  • Technological upgrades for tractor-trailers, costing an average of $32,000, would be cost-effective, with owners recouping the investment in 13 months and netting $170,000 in lifetime savings.
  • Market barriers, specifically the use of fuel surcharges in shipping contracts, discourage for-hire carriers from investing in fuel-efficient technologies because they can pass fuel costs to customers.
  • Five major U.S. fleets—FedEx, UPS, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Walmart—could collectively reduce their fuel usage by over 500 million gallons and save $1.7 billion annually under stronger standards.
  • Food transportation is the most fuel-intensive segment of consumer goods shipping, with trucking food to stores and restaurants requiring more than 2.5 billion gallons of fuel annually.

Cite the original document

APA
Anair, D., Mahmassani, A., & Cooke, D. (2015). Engines for Change. Union of Concerned Scientists. https://www.ucs.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/03/Engines-For-Change-Full-Report.pdf
Chicago
Anair, Don, Amine Mahmassani, and Dave Cooke. Engines for Change. Union of Concerned Scientists, 2015. https://www.ucs.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/03/Engines-For-Change-Full-Report.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Anair |first1=Don |last2=Mahmassani |first2=Amine |last3=Cooke |first3=Dave |title=Engines for Change |publisher=Union of Concerned Scientists |date=March 2015 |url=https://www.ucs.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/03/Engines-For-Change-Full-Report.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{anair2015engines, author = {Anair, Don and Mahmassani, Amine and Cooke, Dave}, title = {{Engines for Change}}, institution = {Union of Concerned Scientists}, year = {2015}, month = mar, url = {https://www.ucs.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/03/Engines-For-Change-Full-Report.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated