ASEAN Guidance for Climate-Smart Land Use Practices

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The review examines six key ASEAN guidelines, including those on Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA), crop insurance, responsible investment, public-private partnerships, and gender mainstreaming. It finds that while these guidelines often lack documented evidence of national-level implementation due to ASEAN's non-binding governance and lack of funding, they serve as critical tools for regional consensus and multilateral policy-making, such as submissions to the UNFCCC. The report recommends moving toward more strategic, intersectoral policy-making, improving the accessibility and readability of documents, and pairing guidelines with concrete implementation plans and monitoring frameworks.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • ASEAN guidelines are non-binding policy tools used to distill best practices into accessible compendiums, reflecting a shared strategic direction among Member States rather than formal legal agreements.
  • The ASEAN Regional Guidelines for Promoting Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) Practices served as a vital tool for regional coordination in international climate negotiations, specifically enabling the first ASEAN submission on agriculture to the UNFCCC's 44th Subsidiary Body of Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA 44).
  • There is a significant gap between the regional endorsement of guidelines and their national-level implementation, with few documented examples of field programmes being executed based on these tools.
  • Successful operationalisation of guidelines is strongly linked to direct support from development partners through dedicated projects and funding.
  • The review identifies a lack of systematic monitoring, evaluation, and learning (M&E) frameworks to track how guidelines are used after they are endorsed.
  • The style and format of guidelines impact their usability; for example, the 'step-by-step' approach of the crop insurance guide was found more practical for governments than text-heavy technical documents.
  • The process of developing guidelines, even without explicit implementation, provides value by fostering regional dialogue, identifying gaps, and legitimising shared priorities.

Cite the original document

APA
Stockholm Environment Institute (2020). ASEAN Guidance for Climate-Smart Land Use Practices. https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/2021-asean-guidance-for-cslu-practices-a-review.pdf
Chicago
Stockholm Environment Institute. ASEAN Guidance for Climate-Smart Land Use Practices. 2020. https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/2021-asean-guidance-for-cslu-practices-a-review.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Stockholm Environment Institute |title=ASEAN Guidance for Climate-Smart Land Use Practices |date=December 2020 |url=https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/2021-asean-guidance-for-cslu-practices-a-review.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{stockholmenvironmentinstitute2020asean, author = {{Stockholm Environment Institute}}, title = {{ASEAN Guidance for Climate-Smart Land Use Practices}}, institution = {Stockholm Environment Institute}, year = {2020}, month = dec, url = {https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/2021-asean-guidance-for-cslu-practices-a-review.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated