Browse all documents

How do we prioritize when making decisions about development and disaster risk?

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This briefing from the Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) presents a typology of five key trade-offs—power, equity, time, risk, and aggregation—that occur when making decisions about development and disaster risk reduction (DRR). The document argues that development often exacerbates disaster risks due to poor decision-making and proposes that understanding these trade-offs can help transform the relationship between development and DRR to build greater resilience, specifically applying this framework to the 'Building Back Better' approach to post-disaster recovery.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The SEI identifies five primary types of trade-offs in decision-making regarding development and disaster risk: power (who is involved and how power is shared), equity (distribution of gains and losses), temporal (short-term vs. long-term gains), risk (prioritization of different types of risks), and aggregation (macro-economic gains vs. disaster losses).
  • The power trade-off highlights that inclusive, bottom-up decision-making processes involving marginalized people and local governments often conflict with efficiency and may face resistance from those currently in power. The document notes that when decision-makers are isolated from the impacts of their choices, they lack the incentive to minimize risks.
  • The equity trade-off involves the uneven distribution of benefits and harms, where disasters in low- and middle-income countries disproportionately impact informal settlements, low-income households, and small businesses due to their limited capacity to reduce risk.
  • The temporal trade-off describes the tendency of individuals and businesses to prioritize immediate gains over long-term resilience. This is often exacerbated by cost-benefit analyses that heavily discount the value of potential future losses.
  • The risk trade-off occurs when decision-makers prioritize risks based on social norms, beliefs, and awareness rather than technical assessments. This can lead to a disconnect where policy interventions are ineffective because they do not align with how citizens actually account for risk.
  • The aggregation trade-off involves weighing overall macro-economic growth (often measured by GDP) against sustainable development and disaster risk. The document argues that GDP is an inadequate measure of development quality and that national-scale gains can mask significant local disaster, social, and environmental risks.
  • When applied to 'Building Back Better', the typology reveals that top-down, donor-driven reconstruction often produces technically safer housing that is nonetheless inappropriate, too expensive to replicate, or difficult to maintain compared to inclusive processes.

Cite the original document

APA
Tuhkanen, H., Han, G., Rosemarin, A., & Davis, M. (2017). How do we prioritize when making decisions about development and disaster risk? Stockholm Environment Institute. https://www.sei.org/mediamanager/documents/Initiatives/TDDR_DB_Tuhkanen_Trade-off_typology_0517_lowres.pdf
Chicago
Tuhkanen, Heidi, Guoyi Han, Arno Rosemarin, and Marion Davis. How do we prioritize when making decisions about development and disaster risk? Stockholm Environment Institute, 2017. https://www.sei.org/mediamanager/documents/Initiatives/TDDR_DB_Tuhkanen_Trade-off_typology_0517_lowres.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Tuhkanen |first1=Heidi |last2=Han |first2=Guoyi |last3=Rosemarin |first3=Arno |last4=Davis |first4=Marion |title=How do we prioritize when making decisions about development and disaster risk? |publisher=Stockholm Environment Institute |date=2017 |url=https://www.sei.org/mediamanager/documents/Initiatives/TDDR_DB_Tuhkanen_Trade-off_typology_0517_lowres.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{tuhkanen2017how, author = {Tuhkanen, Heidi and Han, Guoyi and Rosemarin, Arno and Davis, Marion}, title = {{How do we prioritize when making decisions about development and disaster risk?}}, institution = {Stockholm Environment Institute}, year = {2017}, url = {https://www.sei.org/mediamanager/documents/Initiatives/TDDR_DB_Tuhkanen_Trade-off_typology_0517_lowres.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated