Climate Change - White Paper - Issues and Options for Benchmarking Indstrial GHG Emissions
Summary
This white paper, produced by the Stockholm Environment Institute for the Washington State Department of Ecology, examines the technical and policy options for establishing greenhouse gas (GHG) emission benchmarks for energy-intensive industrial sectors. It identifies key industries—such as aluminum, cement, and steel—that contribute significantly to emissions and discusses how benchmarks (emissions per unit of output) can be used in voluntary goals, cap-and-trade allowance allocations, or regulatory performance standards. The report emphasizes that because Washington has few facilities in some sectors, it must look to broader North American data to create robust benchmarks. It also details the technical process of benchmark construction, including the selection of normalizing units and levels of ambition, while noting sector-specific challenges in industries like petroleum refining and glass.
Key insights
- Industrial processes and energy use are significant contributors to climate change, accounting for over 20% of direct greenhouse gas emissions both globally and within Washington State.
- A small number of energy-intensive industries—specifically iron and steel, aluminum, chemicals, petroleum refining, minerals (such as cement, lime, and glass), and pulp and paper—are responsible for more than 80% of global industrial energy use and the majority of industrial GHG emissions.
- GHG benchmarks are typically defined as the quantity of emissions released per unit of product output, allowing for the assessment of performance across different facilities or against a common standard.
- Benchmarks can be applied across three primary policy frameworks: voluntary performance goals (where companies commit to a benchmark), cap-and-trade programs (where benchmarks inform the free allocation of allowances to industry), and regulatory performance standards (where facilities are legally required to meet a specific standard).
- The level of ambition for a benchmark (whether it is set at average, better-than-average, or top-performing levels) varies by policy context. In voluntary or regulatory programs, the benchmark level directly determines the sector's emissions, whereas in cap-and-trade, benchmarks primarily compensate facilities for allowance costs and do not directly set emission levels.
- The most reliable data for benchmarking are expected to come from state and federal mandatory GHG reporting rules, though these were not available until autumn 2010. Alternative sources include government surveys like the U.S. Energy Information Administration or industry-specific groups like the Cement Sustainability Initiative.
- The construction of a benchmark involves several technical steps: defining the product or activity, establishing measurement protocols and boundaries, choosing a normalizing unit (usually a physical unit of output), and determining the level of ambition.
- Certain industrial sectors present unique benchmarking challenges. For example, the petroleum refining sector is difficult to benchmark due to the wide variation among facilities and the presence of numerous unique processes, while the glass industry faces issues where furnaces must remain running even when production is low, potentially skewing results.
- Heat production is identified as a potential 'sweet spot' for benchmarking because it is a significant intermediate product across multiple sectors, including chemicals, food processing, petroleum refining, and pulp and paper.
- Washington State has established specific GHG emission reduction targets: reducing overall emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, 25% below 1990 levels by 2035, and 50% below 1990 levels by 2050.
Cite the original document
- APA
- Stockholm Environment Institute (n.d.). Climate Change - White Paper - Issues and Options for Benchmarking Indstrial GHG Emissions. https://www.sei.org/mediamanager/documents/Publications/Climate-mitigation-adaptation/Economics_of_climate_policy/sei-benchmarkingwawhitepaper-10.pdf
- Chicago
- Stockholm Environment Institute. Climate Change - White Paper - Issues and Options for Benchmarking Indstrial GHG Emissions. n.d. https://www.sei.org/mediamanager/documents/Publications/Climate-mitigation-adaptation/Economics_of_climate_policy/sei-benchmarkingwawhitepaper-10.pdf.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |author=Stockholm Environment Institute |title=Climate Change - White Paper - Issues and Options for Benchmarking Indstrial GHG Emissions |url=https://www.sei.org/mediamanager/documents/Publications/Climate-mitigation-adaptation/Economics_of_climate_policy/sei-benchmarkingwawhitepaper-10.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{stockholmenvironmentinstitutendclimate, author = {{Stockholm Environment Institute}}, title = {{Climate Change - White Paper - Issues and Options for Benchmarking Indstrial GHG Emissions}}, institution = {Stockholm Environment Institute}, url = {https://www.sei.org/mediamanager/documents/Publications/Climate-mitigation-adaptation/Economics_of_climate_policy/sei-benchmarkingwawhitepaper-10.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated