Environment and wellbeing: a false dichotomy
Summary
The document argues against the perceived dichotomy between the climate change movement and traditional environmentalism, stating that human well-being is inextricably linked to the health of natural systems.
Key insights
- The author contends that the relationship between climate change efforts and traditional environmentalism is not an 'either/or' conflict, as human well-being relies on healthy ecosystems.
- Human existence and technological advancement are entirely dependent on natural systems, including air, water, food, and raw materials, necessitating the maintenance and restoration of these systems.
- While environmental health is critical, the author acknowledges the necessity of meeting human needs for decent living standards, including energy, mobility, and communications.
Cite the original document
- APA
- Kuylenstierna, J. L. (2012). Environment and wellbeing: a false dichotomy. Stockholm Environment Institute. https://www.sei.org/perspectives/environment-wellbeing-false-dichotomy/
- Chicago
- Kuylenstierna, Johan L. Environment and wellbeing: a false dichotomy. Stockholm Environment Institute, 2012. https://www.sei.org/perspectives/environment-wellbeing-false-dichotomy/.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite press release |last1=Kuylenstierna |first1=Johan L. |title=Environment and wellbeing: a false dichotomy |publisher=Stockholm Environment Institute |date=27 June 2012 |url=https://www.sei.org/perspectives/environment-wellbeing-false-dichotomy/ |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @misc{kuylenstierna2012environment, author = {Kuylenstierna, Johan L.}, title = {{Environment and wellbeing: a false dichotomy}}, publisher = {Stockholm Environment Institute}, year = {2012}, month = jun, url = {https://www.sei.org/perspectives/environment-wellbeing-false-dichotomy/}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated