Africa after the 2013 Elysée Summit on Peace and Security

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The research paper examines the 2013 Elysée Summit on Peace and Security, noting that despite institutional changes in France—such as the liquidation of the Africa Cell and the replacement of the ministry of cooperation with the ministry of development—France remains the primary military 'gendarme' in African conflicts. The author highlights recent interventions in Mali (Operation Serval) and the Central African Republic as evidence that France continues to fill security voids that African institutions cannot yet manage. The paper concludes that African powers, specifically South Africa and Nigeria, should redefine 'African solutions to African problems' to include external pivots and improve coordination through initiatives like the African Capacity for Immediate Response to Crises (ACIRC).

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • France has implemented institutional changes to its Africa policy, including the removal of the Africa Cell at the Elysée and the transition from a ministry of cooperation to a ministry of development under Pascal Canfin to promote a multilateral approach to development.
  • Despite signals of retreat and military reorganisation, France continues to act as the primary military intervener in African conflicts, as evidenced by Operation Serval in Mali and the deployment of soldiers to Bangui in the Central African Republic.
  • The reliance on French military intervention to prevent state collapse in Mali and the Central African Republic challenges the African Union's principle of 'African solutions to African problems'.
  • The author recommends that regional powers Nigeria and South Africa coordinate more closely on security and that Nigeria join the South Africa-sponsored African Capacity for Immediate Response to Crises (ACIRC) to better manage continental security.

Cite the original document

APA
South African Institute of International Affairs (2013). Africa after the 2013 Elysée Summit on Peace and Security. https://saiia.org.za/research/africa-after-the-2013-elysee-summit-on-peace-and-security/
Chicago
South African Institute of International Affairs. Africa after the 2013 Elysée Summit on Peace and Security. 2013. https://saiia.org.za/research/africa-after-the-2013-elysee-summit-on-peace-and-security/.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=South African Institute of International Affairs |title=Africa after the 2013 Elysée Summit on Peace and Security |date=6 December 2013 |url=https://saiia.org.za/research/africa-after-the-2013-elysee-summit-on-peace-and-security/ |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{southafricaninstituteofinternationalaffairs2013africa, author = {{South African Institute of International Affairs}}, title = {{Africa after the 2013 Elysée Summit on Peace and Security}}, institution = {South African Institute of International Affairs}, year = {2013}, month = dec, url = {https://saiia.org.za/research/africa-after-the-2013-elysee-summit-on-peace-and-security/}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated