Browse all documents

Seeing the Forest and the Trees: The Global Challenge of Regulating Social Media for Democracy

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This research paper examines the complex regulatory challenges posed by social media platforms and their dual capacity to both support and undermine democratic processes globally.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Social media is defined as a broad set of Internet-based communication technologies characterized by user-generated content and interaction. These platforms, which include broadcast-focused sites like YouTube and X (formerly Twitter), network-focused sites like Facebook, and messaging-focused sites like WhatsApp, are primarily operated by private corporations that monetize user interactions.
  • Social media platforms have demonstrated a capacity to strengthen democracy by enabling the formation of organic communities and the amplification of political demands. Examples include the 'Black Lives Matter' and 'Rhodes Must Fall' movements, which used these tools to connect across political and geographical boundaries and alter political agendas.
  • The potential for social media to undermine democracy stems from both inherent platform design and the actions of external actors. Inherent risks include the reinforcement of insular perspectives and the ability to purchase visibility. Additionally, well-funded negative actors utilize these platforms to create networks of disinformation, misinformation, and surveillance to gain disproportionate political influence.
  • Policymakers face a complex regulatory challenge that requires balancing the positive outcomes of social networking with the significant harms they can cause. The author argues against viewing social media through a simple dichotomy of 'good' or 'bad,' instead calling for a holistic regulatory approach that considers the entire ecosystem to achieve a utopic outcome.

Cite the original document

APA
South African Institute of International Affairs (2023). Seeing the Forest and the Trees: The Global Challenge of Regulating Social Media for Democracy. https://saiia.org.za/research/seeing-the-forest-and-the-trees-the-global-challenge-of-regulating-social-media-for-democracy/
Chicago
South African Institute of International Affairs. Seeing the Forest and the Trees: The Global Challenge of Regulating Social Media for Democracy. 2023. https://saiia.org.za/research/seeing-the-forest-and-the-trees-the-global-challenge-of-regulating-social-media-for-democracy/.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=South African Institute of International Affairs |title=Seeing the Forest and the Trees: The Global Challenge of Regulating Social Media for Democracy |date=4 December 2023 |url=https://saiia.org.za/research/seeing-the-forest-and-the-trees-the-global-challenge-of-regulating-social-media-for-democracy/ |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{southafricaninstituteofinternationalaffairs2023seeing, author = {{South African Institute of International Affairs}}, title = {{Seeing the Forest and the Trees: The Global Challenge of Regulating Social Media for Democracy}}, institution = {South African Institute of International Affairs}, year = {2023}, month = dec, url = {https://saiia.org.za/research/seeing-the-forest-and-the-trees-the-global-challenge-of-regulating-social-media-for-democracy/}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated