Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document highlights a gap in corporate carbon accounting, noting that current practices focus more on the assignment of emissions than on the actual impact of climate actions. It advocates for consequential accounting to ensure that novel business models for emissions reduction deliver genuine progress toward 1.5°C goals.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Current corporate carbon accounting practices prioritize the assignment of emissions over the assessment of the actual impact resulting from climate actions.
  • As companies move from setting targets to implementation, they are adopting new business models for emissions reduction that some critics believe lack real-world impact.
  • Consequential accounting methods are essential for evaluating and incentivizing a company's efforts to reduce emissions and for proving progress toward climate targets.

Cite the original document

APA
RMI (2023). Accounting for Impact. https://rmi.org/resources/accounting-for-impact/
Chicago
RMI. Accounting for Impact. 2023. https://rmi.org/resources/accounting-for-impact/.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=RMI |title=Accounting for Impact |date=9 February 2023 |url=https://rmi.org/resources/accounting-for-impact/ |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{rmi2023accounting, author = {{RMI}}, title = {{Accounting for Impact}}, institution = {RMI}, year = {2023}, month = feb, url = {https://rmi.org/resources/accounting-for-impact/}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated