CAN FOSSIL GAS INFRASTRUCTURE BE CONVERTED TO EXTEND ITS LIFESPAN?

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The briefing contends that converting fossil gas infrastructure to other energy sources is generally unrealistic due to technical challenges, prohibitive costs, and insufficient projected energy volumes. It asserts that hydrogen and biogas cannot replace the scale of fossil gas, and that 'blending' serves only to prolong fossil gas dependency. While it acknowledges limited viability for converting long-distance pipelines and geological storage for 'hard-to-abate' sectors, it concludes that no new gas infrastructure is justified based on future conversion potential.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Projected energy volumes for hydrogen and gaseous bioenergy (biogas and biomethane) by 2050 are significantly lower than current fossil gas volumes, meaning infrastructure requirements for these alternatives will be much smaller. Specifically, hydrogen is projected at 6 Exajoules (EJ) and gaseous bioenergy at 15 EJ, compared to 145 EJ for current fossil gas.
  • The practice of 'blending' fossil gas with hydrogen or biomethane is viewed as a method to maintain a system dependent on fossil gas rather than a genuine decarbonization tool, as it reduces greenhouse gas emissions less effectively than infrastructure dedicated solely to blended gases.
  • Hydrogen conversion is only viable for specific applications related to 'hard-to-abate' sectors, such as the conversion of long-distance transport pipelines and long-term geological storage (e.g., salt caverns and depleted oil and gas reservoirs). However, converting LNG terminals for liquefied hydrogen is considered economically unviable due to prohibitive costs and technical challenges.
  • Converting infrastructure for biogas is deemed pointless and unjustifiable because industrial biogas development is considered unsustainable, lacking climate change mitigation benefits and causing harm to biodiversity, ecosystems, human health, and agricultural land.

Cite the original document

APA
Reclaim Finance (n.d.). CAN FOSSIL GAS INFRASTRUCTURE BE CONVERTED TO EXTEND ITS LIFESPAN? https://reclaimfinance.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Can-gas-infrastructure-be-converted-to-extend-its-lifespan.pdf
Chicago
Reclaim Finance. CAN FOSSIL GAS INFRASTRUCTURE BE CONVERTED TO EXTEND ITS LIFESPAN? n.d. https://reclaimfinance.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Can-gas-infrastructure-be-converted-to-extend-its-lifespan.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Reclaim Finance |title=CAN FOSSIL GAS INFRASTRUCTURE BE CONVERTED TO EXTEND ITS LIFESPAN? |url=https://reclaimfinance.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Can-gas-infrastructure-be-converted-to-extend-its-lifespan.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{reclaimfinancendcan, author = {{Reclaim Finance}}, title = {{CAN FOSSIL GAS INFRASTRUCTURE BE CONVERTED TO EXTEND ITS LIFESPAN?}}, institution = {Reclaim Finance}, url = {https://reclaimfinance.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Can-gas-infrastructure-be-converted-to-extend-its-lifespan.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated