Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document examines the review of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 (UNSCR 1325), highlighting the 'Global Study' and the resulting UNSCR 2242. It notes a general failure in implementation, particularly regarding sexual violence in conflict, and identifies emerging threats such as the militarization of women's lives due to violent extremism and critical funding shortages caused by shifting donor priorities in Europe and the Nordic countries.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The Global Study, which informed the 15th anniversary review of UNSCR 1325, concluded that the implementation of the resolution has been insufficient, with civil society expressing particular disappointment over the lack of action regarding sexual violence in conflict.
  • Despite an inclusive methodology involving 317 organizations across 71 countries, the Global Study faced criticism from Latin American women's organizations for lacking local representation and being dominated by the Global North.
  • The review process emphasized the necessity of earmarking funds specifically for women and women's organizations, particularly within peacebuilding efforts, and highlighted the critical role of women in conflict prevention and addressing root causes.
  • There is a growing concern that the fight against violent extremism may lead to the 'militarization' of women's lives, where human rights arguments are used to justify military operations or women are placed in vulnerable positions as ground partners.
  • The Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda faces a critical funding shortage, exacerbated by European donor countries diverting development funds to manage their own migration crises and by revised strategies in Nordic countries.

Cite the original document

APA
Tryggestad, T. L. (2016). The Women, Peace and Security Review Process. Peace Research Institute Oslo. https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/78a2cf93-667c-4a3c-9375-65af213441e4/The Women Peace and Security Agenda - 15 Years On.pdf?inline=true
Chicago
Tryggestad, Torunn L. The Women, Peace and Security Review Process. Peace Research Institute Oslo, 2016. https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/78a2cf93-667c-4a3c-9375-65af213441e4/The Women Peace and Security Agenda - 15 Years On.pdf?inline=true.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Tryggestad |first1=Torunn L. |title=The Women, Peace and Security Review Process |publisher=Peace Research Institute Oslo |date=2016 |url=https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/78a2cf93-667c-4a3c-9375-65af213441e4/The Women Peace and Security Agenda - 15 Years On.pdf?inline=true |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{tryggestad2016women, author = {Tryggestad, Torunn L.}, title = {{The Women, Peace and Security Review Process}}, institution = {Peace Research Institute Oslo}, year = {2016}, url = {https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/78a2cf93-667c-4a3c-9375-65af213441e4/The Women Peace and Security Agenda - 15 Years On.pdf?inline=true}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated