Sida’s Contributions to Humanitarian Mine Action Final Report

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The report finds that Sida's support for Humanitarian Mine Action (HMA) has been fragmented and ad hoc, heavily prioritizing mine clearance (85% of funding) over other essential components like impact assessment and survey. While Sida has been a major global donor, its funding trended downward after 1998. The evaluation highlights a 'quiet revolution' in HMA, shifting from output-based measures (mines removed) to impact-based measures (societal effect), and argues that Sida must institutionalize impact assessment to ensure sustainable, development-oriented assistance. It analyzes various implementation channels, noting that NGOs are flexible and innovative but struggle with long-term sustainability, while government/military channels offer better sustainability but may lack humanitarian sensitivity. The report also critiques Sida's R&D and technical initiatives, such as the Mine Detection Dog project in Cambodia, for failing to base needs on local stakeholders and lacking sustainability.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Sida's approach to Humanitarian Mine Action (HMA) has been characterized as fragmented and ad hoc, lacking a cohesive policy position and relying on year-by-year decision-making.
  • Sida has heavily prioritized mine clearance over other HMA activities, with approximately 85% of its contributions from 1991 to 1999 allocated to clearance.
  • There is a global shift in HMA from 'output' measurements (number of mines lifted or area cleared) to 'impact' measurements (the variable effects of mines on human populations).
  • Sida has not funded the development of impact-assessment methodologies despite supporting the general reorientation toward impact-centered HMA.
  • NGOs are effective implementation channels due to their flexibility and innovation, but they often fail to build sustainable local organizations or coordinate with non-HMA humanitarian initiatives.
  • Government and military implementation channels provide a stronger basis for sustainable national capacity, provided the government is committed, but they may struggle to integrate a broader humanitarian agenda.
  • Mine Action Centres (MACs) are generally effective as coordination bodies but often exercise excessive control, which can hinder innovation and the development of viable national organizations.
  • Coordination between HMA and other humanitarian or development efforts is generally poor, as mine action is still largely viewed as a specialized technical sector.
  • Swedish R&D projects in demining machines and multisensors were largely unsuccessful because they were driven by entrepreneurial interests rather than field-based needs and were often too cumbersome for practical use.
  • The Swedish Mine Detection Dog (MDD) project in Cambodia failed due to poor institutional arrangements, low transparency, and a lack of integration with the Cambodian Mine Action Centre (CMAC).
  • Sida's secondment of technical experts is viewed as successful for visibility and influence, but it risks sustainability if capacity-building for local counterparts is not explicitly mandated.

Cite the original document

APA
Harpviken, K. B., Millard, A. S., Kjellman, K. E., & Strand, A. (2001). Sida’s Contributions to Humanitarian Mine Action Final Report. Peace Research Institute Oslo. https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/85c28ff7-18f0-466f-8b42-54116432e096/Sidas Contributions to Humanitarian Mine Action.pdf?inline=true
Chicago
Harpviken, Kristian Berg, Ananda S. Millard, Kjell Erling Kjellman, and Arne Strand. Sida’s Contributions to Humanitarian Mine Action Final Report. Peace Research Institute Oslo, 2001. https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/85c28ff7-18f0-466f-8b42-54116432e096/Sidas Contributions to Humanitarian Mine Action.pdf?inline=true.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Harpviken |first1=Kristian Berg |last2=Millard |first2=Ananda S. |last3=Kjellman |first3=Kjell Erling |last4=Strand |first4=Arne |title=Sida’s Contributions to Humanitarian Mine Action Final Report |publisher=Peace Research Institute Oslo |date=2001 |url=https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/85c28ff7-18f0-466f-8b42-54116432e096/Sidas Contributions to Humanitarian Mine Action.pdf?inline=true |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{harpviken2001sidas, author = {Harpviken, Kristian Berg and Millard, Ananda S. and Kjellman, Kjell Erling and Strand, Arne}, title = {{Sida’s Contributions to Humanitarian Mine Action Final Report}}, institution = {Peace Research Institute Oslo}, year = {2001}, url = {https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/85c28ff7-18f0-466f-8b42-54116432e096/Sidas Contributions to Humanitarian Mine Action.pdf?inline=true}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated