Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The text explores transnational practice as a spatial phenomenon where human actions and relationships stretch across national borders. It details key manifestations of this practice, including the economic impact of remittances, the symbolic and material role of transnational house building, and the political engagement of diasporas. The author argues that while these practices are central to the lives of migrants, digital technology has expanded transnational activity to a broader segment of the global population.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Transnational practice refers to human actions and relationships that extend across geographical distances and national borders, ranging from everyday family interactions to collective political or religious mobilization.
  • International remittances to private individuals in low- and middle-income countries are estimated to be three times the amount provided as official development assistance to those same countries.
  • Remittances serve diverse purposes beyond basic household expenses like food and electricity; they are used for debt repayment (including migration costs), education, private business investments, and improving family housing standards.
  • Transnational house building is a global phenomenon used by migrants to signal continued belonging to their place of origin, often funded through remittances for new construction, repairs, or urban property investments.
  • Diaspora politics involves state-regulated relations with citizens living abroad, covering issues such as voting rights, candidacy in elections, property ownership, and investment rules.
  • While many countries allow dual citizenship, actual electoral participation by migrants in their countries of origin is often inconsistent due to technical barriers, registration requirements, or personal ambivalence regarding democratic legitimacy.
  • Digital tools, particularly smartphones and apps like WhatsApp, have intensified transnational social fields by making communication easy and free, extending transnational practices to people without a migration history through digital political mobilization or international organizational support.

Cite the original document

APA
Erdal, M. B. (n.d.). Transnasjonal praksis. Peace Research Institute Oslo. https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/67de6437-8f10-4d47-8de5-6b4daa3385e6/9788202899028_kap_37.pdf?inline=true
Chicago
Erdal, Marta Bivand. Transnasjonal praksis. Peace Research Institute Oslo, n.d. https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/67de6437-8f10-4d47-8de5-6b4daa3385e6/9788202899028_kap_37.pdf?inline=true.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Erdal |first1=Marta Bivand |title=Transnasjonal praksis |publisher=Peace Research Institute Oslo |url=https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/67de6437-8f10-4d47-8de5-6b4daa3385e6/9788202899028_kap_37.pdf?inline=true |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{erdalndtransnasjonal, author = {Erdal, Marta Bivand}, title = {{Transnasjonal praksis}}, institution = {Peace Research Institute Oslo}, url = {https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/67de6437-8f10-4d47-8de5-6b4daa3385e6/9788202899028_kap_37.pdf?inline=true}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated