The Challenges of Assessing Collective Progress: Design Options for an Effective Global Stocktake
Summary
The paper identifies four essential functions for the Global Stocktake (GST)—acting as a policy pacemaker, ensuring accountability, driving ambition, and signaling commitment—while highlighting data gaps in NDC emissions quantification as a primary challenge. It proposes that the UNFCCC maximize GST effectiveness through public appraisals, the use of performance distributions for collective assessments, sectoral discussions in expert dialogues, and IPCC-led benchmark identification, supplemented by independent civil society and academic analysis.
Key insights
- An effective Global Stocktake should serve four primary functions: acting as a pacemaker for policy processes, ensuring country accountability, driving higher ambition in future NDC cycles, and signaling a renewed commitment to the goals of the Paris Agreement.
- The assessment of collective progress via the GST is hindered by a limited mandate and significant data gaps regarding the aggregation and quantification of emissions within NDCs.
- To increase effectiveness, the UNFCCC should implement public appraisals of inputs, utilize a performance distributions approach for collective assessments, incorporate detailed sectoral system discussions into expert dialogues, and engage the IPCC to identify benchmarks from available research.
Cite the original document
- APA
- NewClimate Institute (2021). The Challenges of Assessing Collective Progress: Design Options for an Effective Global Stocktake. http://www.newclimate.org/resources/publications/the-challenges-of-assessing-collective-progress-design-options-for-an
- Chicago
- NewClimate Institute. The Challenges of Assessing Collective Progress: Design Options for an Effective Global Stocktake. 2021. http://www.newclimate.org/resources/publications/the-challenges-of-assessing-collective-progress-design-options-for-an.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |author=NewClimate Institute |title=The Challenges of Assessing Collective Progress: Design Options for an Effective Global Stocktake |date=7 May 2021 |url=http://www.newclimate.org/resources/publications/the-challenges-of-assessing-collective-progress-design-options-for-an |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{newclimateinstitute2021challenges, author = {{NewClimate Institute}}, title = {{The Challenges of Assessing Collective Progress: Design Options for an Effective Global Stocktake}}, institution = {NewClimate Institute}, year = {2021}, month = may, url = {http://www.newclimate.org/resources/publications/the-challenges-of-assessing-collective-progress-design-options-for-an}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated