Browse all documents

International Thematic Study on the Global Stocktake

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This report by the NewClimate Institute examines how the Global Stocktake (GST) can be used to assess progress on climate mitigation and adaptation across five countries, with a specific focus on aligning finance flows and international cooperation to meet Paris Agreement goals.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • There is a significant gap between the current provision of international climate finance (ICF) and the actual needs of developing countries. Furthermore, ICF has been disproportionately allocated to mitigation, leaving adaptation and loss and damage underfunded, which necessitates a more balanced approach to ensure equity.
  • The report identifies a disconnect between Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and Long Term Low Emissions Development Strategies (LT-LEDS). The GST could address this by exploring reasons for the disconnect and finding ways to align short-term actions with long-term goals to facilitate just transitions to net zero GHG emissions.
  • Standardizing methodologies and metrics for reporting climate finance is a priority for the GST, particularly for adaptation. Because adaptation metrics are complex and may not aggregate like mitigation tons or financial Euros, the report suggests the GST consider qualitative approaches and process metrics.
  • The GST is viewed as a critical mechanism for operationalizing Article 2.1c regarding the alignment of finance flows. Key methodological gaps include defining what counts as climate finance, determining responsibility for provision under Article 9, and accessing data from non-Party stakeholders to measure the consistency of finance with Paris Agreement goals.
  • Country-level research indicates that none of the studied countries had initiated preparations for the GST, suggesting that the purpose of the GST and the nature of country participation are not yet clearly communicated.

Cite the original document

APA
NewClimate Institute (2022). International Thematic Study on the Global Stocktake. http://www.newclimate.org/resources/publications/international-thematic-study-on-the-global-stocktake
Chicago
NewClimate Institute. International Thematic Study on the Global Stocktake. 2022. http://www.newclimate.org/resources/publications/international-thematic-study-on-the-global-stocktake.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=NewClimate Institute |title=International Thematic Study on the Global Stocktake |date=2 September 2022 |url=http://www.newclimate.org/resources/publications/international-thematic-study-on-the-global-stocktake |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{newclimateinstitute2022international, author = {{NewClimate Institute}}, title = {{International Thematic Study on the Global Stocktake}}, institution = {NewClimate Institute}, year = {2022}, month = sep, url = {http://www.newclimate.org/resources/publications/international-thematic-study-on-the-global-stocktake}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated