Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The Supreme Court of Nepal ordered the government to enact a new climate change law after finding that the Environmental Protection Act of 1997 was inadequate for mitigation and adaptation. The court ruled that inaction violated constitutional rights to a dignified life and a healthy environment, as well as international commitments under the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement. Following the decision, Nepal passed the Environment Protection Act of 2019 and the Forests Act of 2019.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The Supreme Court of Nepal ruled that the government must enact a new climate change law to facilitate climate change mitigation and adaptation, decrease fossil fuel consumption, and encourage the use of low carbon technologies.
  • The court found that the existing Environmental Protection Act of 1997 was insufficient for addressing climate change mitigation and adaptation needs, and that a new law was necessary for Nepal to fulfill its domestic constitutional obligations and international commitments under the Paris Agreement.
  • The court mandated that the government create legal and scientific mechanisms to provide compensation to residents of Nepal affected by environmental degradation and pollution.
  • In response to the court's decision, the government of Nepal enacted the Forests Act of 2019 and the Environment Protection Act of 2019 to address climate adaptation and mitigation.

Cite the original document

APA
Natural Justice (2021). SHRESTHA V. OFFICE OF THE PRIME MINISTER ET AL. https://naturaljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Shrestha-v.-Office-of-the-Prime-Minister-et-al..pdf
Chicago
Natural Justice. SHRESTHA V. OFFICE OF THE PRIME MINISTER ET AL. 2021. https://naturaljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Shrestha-v.-Office-of-the-Prime-Minister-et-al..pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Natural Justice |title=SHRESTHA V. OFFICE OF THE PRIME MINISTER ET AL. |date=December 2021 |url=https://naturaljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Shrestha-v.-Office-of-the-Prime-Minister-et-al..pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{naturaljustice2021shrestha, author = {{Natural Justice}}, title = {{SHRESTHA V. OFFICE OF THE PRIME MINISTER ET AL.}}, institution = {Natural Justice}, year = {2021}, month = dec, url = {https://naturaljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Shrestha-v.-Office-of-the-Prime-Minister-et-al..pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated