bcp-toolkit-espanol-parte-iii-1-291b6a21be25bada.pdf

The document outlines strategies for using biocultural community protocols to establish dialogue with external stakeholders, raise awareness internally and externally, and participate in legal and administrative decision-making processes. It emphasizes the use of participatory communication tools—such as video, photography, and community mapping—to balance power dynamics and ensure Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC). The guide also provides practical advice on navigating national and international legal frameworks, negotiating binding agreements, and resolving conflicts through non-violent, alternative dispute resolution mechanisms.

• Biocultural community protocols serve as a platform for constructive dialogue with external actors, including government officials, companies, researchers, and NGOs, allowing communities to engage on their own terms and priorities.
• Proactively notifying external actors about a community protocol can stimulate positive action, help prevent conflicts, and foster transparency and accountability in both public and private sectors.
• Participatory communication tools, such as video, photography, audio interviews, and theater, are recommended for raising awareness within the community, among other communities, and with the general public to affirm collective identity and mobilize support.
• Communities can use protocols to participate in impact assessments, though they often face barriers such as the use of complex Western scientific methods by consultants hired by project promoters, which may ignore indigenous worldviews and traditional decision-making systems.
• Strategic participation in international intergovernmental processes, such as the Convention on Biological Diversity, is described as a long-term investment that can influence national and sub-national laws and policies.
• Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) is defined as a continuous process rather than a single event, granting communities the right to seek more information, say 'no', or withdraw from negotiations at any stage.
• To resolve conflicts related to natural resource management, communities are encouraged to use non-violent, alternative dispute resolution methods—such as facilitators or mediators—rather than formal litigation, which is often costly and time-consuming.

APA

Natural Justice (n.d.). bcp-toolkit-espanol-parte-iii-1-291b6a21be25bada.pdf. https://naturaljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/BCP-Toolkit-Espanol-Parte-III-1.pdf

Chicago

Natural Justice. bcp-toolkit-espanol-parte-iii-1-291b6a21be25bada.pdf. n.d. https://naturaljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/BCP-Toolkit-Espanol-Parte-III-1.pdf.

Wikipedia

{{cite report |author=Natural Justice |title=bcp-toolkit-espanol-parte-iii-1-291b6a21be25bada.pdf |url=https://naturaljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/BCP-Toolkit-Espanol-Parte-III-1.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}

BibTeX

@techreport{naturaljusticendbcptoolkitespanolparteiii1291b6a21be25badapdf, author = {{Natural Justice}}, title = {{bcp-toolkit-espanol-parte-iii-1-291b6a21be25bada.pdf}}, institution = {Natural Justice}, url = {https://naturaljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/BCP-Toolkit-Espanol-Parte-III-1.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }