Possibilités de renforcer la résilience en intégrant le financement et l’assurance des risques climatiques et de catastrophes (CDRFI) dans les Plans nationaux d’adaptation (PNA)

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The analysis reveals that while many countries link adaptation to disaster risk management and prioritize insurance—particularly for agriculture—there is a need for better risk analysis, adaptive social protection, and stronger dialogue between finance ministries and private CDRFI providers.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • A significant portion of National Adaptation Plan (NAP) documents and Green Climate Fund (GCF) preparatory activity proposals use historical disaster costs to justify adaptation efforts, though these references are primarily retrospective. Specifically, 48% of studied NAP documents and 42% of GCF proposals refer to climate-related disaster costs in their context sections.
  • There is a strong connection between adaptation and disaster risk management (DRM) in national planning. DRM is identified as a priority adaptation sector or strategy in over 70% of analyzed NAP documents and is linked to specific measures in more than 80% of them.
  • Insurance is the most prevalent CDRFI solution mentioned in NAP documents, appearing in 90% of them and listed as a priority or adaptation action in 81%. It is most frequently applied to the livestock, agriculture, and fisheries sectors; of the 19 countries including insurance in their plans, 58% focused on these specific sectors.
  • Other financial and data-driven resilience tools are utilized to varying degrees: 33% of analyzed NAPs explicitly reference social protection as a means to strengthen resilience for vulnerable groups, and 76% of countries identify the improvement of data production, management, and analysis as a priority measure.

Cite the original document

APA
NAP Global Network (2021). Possibilités de renforcer la résilience en intégrant le financement et l’assurance des risques climatiques et de catastrophes (CDRFI) dans les Plans nationaux d’adaptation (PNA). https://napglobalnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/napgn-igp-fr-2021-integrating-cdfri-in-nap-processes.pdf
Chicago
NAP Global Network. Possibilités de renforcer la résilience en intégrant le financement et l’assurance des risques climatiques et de catastrophes (CDRFI) dans les Plans nationaux d’adaptation (PNA). 2021. https://napglobalnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/napgn-igp-fr-2021-integrating-cdfri-in-nap-processes.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=NAP Global Network |title=Possibilités de renforcer la résilience en intégrant le financement et l’assurance des risques climatiques et de catastrophes (CDRFI) dans les Plans nationaux d’adaptation (PNA) |date=July 2021 |url=https://napglobalnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/napgn-igp-fr-2021-integrating-cdfri-in-nap-processes.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{napglobalnetwork2021possibilits, author = {{NAP Global Network}}, title = {{Possibilités de renforcer la résilience en intégrant le financement et l’assurance des risques climatiques et de catastrophes (CDRFI) dans les Plans nationaux d’adaptation (PNA)}}, institution = {NAP Global Network}, year = {2021}, month = jul, url = {https://napglobalnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/napgn-igp-fr-2021-integrating-cdfri-in-nap-processes.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated