Browse all documents

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This report section details public perceptions of crime prevention and safety in Malawi, based on the Malawi National Crime Victimisation Survey. It highlights a strong public preference for punitive law enforcement, the prevalence of community-based protection groups, high levels of social cohesion, and low awareness of formal initiatives like Community Police Forums and victim support services.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Most Malawians believe the government and police should take the lead in crime reduction, favoring a punitive approach. Specifically, 43.9% of respondents want increased visibility of police patrols and units, and 27.8% want an increase in armed police patrols. In contrast, only 10.1% suggested increasing penalties for offenders and only 7.6% believed creating more employment would address crime.
  • While few individuals take personal steps to protect themselves—75.5% reported doing nothing—there is significant reliance on community-based protection. 44% of respondents identified organized groups other than the police providing protection, including neighborhood watches, private security, and informal vigilante organizations. These groups often administer their own justice; 33% of those aware of such groups reported they handed out punishment independently, and 23.5% had personally seen them mete out physical punishment.
  • The prevalence and behavior of community protection groups vary by region. They are most common in the Northern Region (72.1%), followed by the Central Region (55.5%) and the Southern Region (29.3%). However, these groups are more likely to administer punishment in the Central (28.4%) and Southern (23.3%) regions than in the Northern Region (10.2%).
  • Malawi exhibits high levels of community cohesion and social trust. 98.4% of respondents know their next-door neighbors, 91.5% would trust neighbors with their house, and 87.6% would trust them with their children. Additionally, 68.9% of respondents are actively involved in community-based organizations, though men (72.6%) participate more than women (64.1%).
  • Awareness and participation in Community Police Forums (CPFs) are very low due to the novelty of the initiative. Only 18.2% of respondents knew what a CPF was, and only 9.3% reported one in their area. Misconceptions are common, with 26.9% believing CPFs function to arrest criminals and 25.6% believing they protect the community. Among those who knew of a CPF, 79.8% viewed the structure as effective.
  • Victim support services are largely unknown in Malawi, with only 6.4% of the sample aware of such services and only 22.3% of those having accessed them. Despite this lack of awareness, there is overwhelming support for such services, with 95.6% of respondents believing victims should receive support, particularly for the recovery of stolen goods or financial assistance (supported by 48.9%).

Cite the original document

APA
Institute for Security Studies (n.d.). Crimes of Need. https://issafrica.s3.amazonaws.com/site/uploads/CRIMES9PUBLIC.PDF
Chicago
Institute for Security Studies. Crimes of Need. n.d. https://issafrica.s3.amazonaws.com/site/uploads/CRIMES9PUBLIC.PDF.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Institute for Security Studies |title=Crimes of Need |url=https://issafrica.s3.amazonaws.com/site/uploads/CRIMES9PUBLIC.PDF |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{instituteforsecuritystudiesndcrimes, author = {{Institute for Security Studies}}, title = {{Crimes of Need}}, institution = {Institute for Security Studies}, url = {https://issafrica.s3.amazonaws.com/site/uploads/CRIMES9PUBLIC.PDF}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated