Browse all documents

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This briefing examines the possibility of Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto running for the Kenyan presidency on 4 March 2013 despite ICC indictments for crimes against humanity. It notes that the trial start date is a critical factor, with the defence proposing March of the following year. The text highlights the ICC's stance of non-interference in Kenyan political eligibility and discusses the domestic political tensions and legal challenges surrounding the candidates' eligibility.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto may be able to run for President in the elections scheduled for 4 March 2013 if the ICC judges agree with the Prosecutor and defence teams to start the trial in March of the following year.
  • Kenyatta and Ruto, along with two others, are accused of bearing the greatest responsibility for crimes against humanity during the 2007/08 post-election violence. The ICC is expected to rule on the trial date before its summer break on 13 July.
  • The ICC has stated that it will not interfere with Kenya's internal processes regarding who can run for political office and that the country's elections do not influence its decisions.
  • There are varying interpretations of why the Hague Prosecutor accepted a delay in the trial date, including the need to strengthen evidence, allowing new Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda time to settle into office, or avoiding the appearance of interfering in partisan Kenyan politics.
  • Domestic opposition to Kenyatta and Ruto's candidacy includes legal challenges from two civil society organisations and three voters seeking to bar them from the presidency.

Cite the original document

APA
Institute for Security Studies (n.d.). Kenya: Kenyatta and Ruto could still run. https://issafrica.org/research/publication-archives/cpra-daily-briefing/kenya-kenyatta-and-ruto-could-still-run
Chicago
Institute for Security Studies. Kenya: Kenyatta and Ruto could still run. n.d. https://issafrica.org/research/publication-archives/cpra-daily-briefing/kenya-kenyatta-and-ruto-could-still-run.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Institute for Security Studies |title=Kenya: Kenyatta and Ruto could still run |url=https://issafrica.org/research/publication-archives/cpra-daily-briefing/kenya-kenyatta-and-ruto-could-still-run |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{instituteforsecuritystudiesndkenya, author = {{Institute for Security Studies}}, title = {{Kenya: Kenyatta and Ruto could still run}}, institution = {Institute for Security Studies}, url = {https://issafrica.org/research/publication-archives/cpra-daily-briefing/kenya-kenyatta-and-ruto-could-still-run}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated