A Guidebook to Fossil-Fuel Subsidy Reform for policy-makers in Southeast Asia

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The guidebook outlines a holistic approach to fossil-fuel subsidy reform in Southeast Asia, emphasizing a gradual transition to market-based pricing. It details methods for projecting economic and social impacts, designing mitigation measures such as targeted cash transfers, and building political support through internal coordination and external communication. The guide highlights that while subsidies are often intended to protect the poor, they frequently benefit wealthier populations and create fiscal burdens and environmental damage.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Fossil-fuel subsidies in Southeast Asia are often inefficient welfare tools that disproportionately benefit high-income groups. For example, in Indonesia, the richest half of households were estimated to consume 84 per cent of subsidized gasoline, while the poorest 10 per cent accounted for less than 1 per cent.
  • The GSI recommends a gradual approach to subsidy reform where possible, as it allows strategies to be adapted based on the outcomes of successive price increases and reduces the risk of large economic shocks. However, a 'big bang' approach may be necessary for countries with extreme budget deficits or intractable political opposition.
  • Effective fossil-fuel pricing consists of two primary components: establishing market-based prices and creating a competitive, efficient energy market. A good pricing mechanism should involve no subsidies, be fully transparent, be well enforced, and automatically reflect international price fluctuations.
  • Formula-based automatic pricing mechanisms are recommended as a useful bridge toward full market-based pricing, as they introduce transparency and accustom market participants to the idea that market forces, rather than government, determine prices.
  • Subsidy reform can lead to significant positive outcomes, including reduced government expenditure, improved trade balances, and decreased greenhouse gas emissions. Phasing out consumption subsidies globally between 2011 and 2020 could potentially cut carbon dioxide emissions by 5.8 per cent.
  • To manage the negative impacts of reform, the GSI suggests a mix of quantitative and qualitative assessments. Quantitative methods include simple analysis based on economic databases (like PSIAs), Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) models, and energy sector models.
  • Mitigation measures for subsidy reform fall into three categories: the implementation strategy (e.g., gradual phase-out), responses to impacts (e.g., targeted social assistance), and efforts to counteract price rises (e.g., improving distribution efficiency).
  • Cash transfers are identified as a more efficient alternative to broad-based subsidies for providing welfare assistance to low-income households, as they can be targeted to those most in need and avoid wasting resources on wealthier strata.
  • Building political support requires a 'whole-of-government' approach, involving internal coordination across ministries and agencies to ensure the government speaks with one voice.
  • Effective communication strategies should use simple, varied messages targeted at specific groups, framing reform not as a goal in itself but as a means to achieve tangible social and economic improvements.
  • The Philippines is cited as a successful example of moving toward market-based pricing, having abolished its Oil Price Stabilization Fund (OPSF) and automatic pricing mechanisms in 1998 in favor of full deregulation.

Cite the original document

APA
Beaton, C., Gerasimchuk, I., Laan, T., Lang, K., Vis-Dunbar, D., & Wooders, P. (2013). A Guidebook to Fossil-Fuel Subsidy Reform for policy-makers in Southeast Asia. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/gsi/sites/default/files/ffs_guidebook.pdf
Chicago
Beaton, Christopher, Ivetta Gerasimchuk, Tara Laan, Kerryn Lang, Damon Vis-Dunbar, and Peter Wooders. A Guidebook to Fossil-Fuel Subsidy Reform for policy-makers in Southeast Asia. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2013. https://www.iisd.org/gsi/sites/default/files/ffs_guidebook.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Beaton |first1=Christopher |last2=Gerasimchuk |first2=Ivetta |last3=Laan |first3=Tara |last4=Lang |first4=Kerryn |last5=Vis-Dunbar |first5=Damon |last6=Wooders |first6=Peter |title=A Guidebook to Fossil-Fuel Subsidy Reform for policy-makers in Southeast Asia |publisher=International Institute for Sustainable Development |date=2013 |url=https://www.iisd.org/gsi/sites/default/files/ffs_guidebook.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{beaton2013guidebook, author = {Beaton, Christopher and Gerasimchuk, Ivetta and Laan, Tara and Lang, Kerryn and Vis-Dunbar, Damon and Wooders, Peter}, title = {{A Guidebook to Fossil-Fuel Subsidy Reform for policy-makers in Southeast Asia}}, institution = {International Institute for Sustainable Development}, year = {2013}, url = {https://www.iisd.org/gsi/sites/default/files/ffs_guidebook.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated