Browse all documents

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This briefing by the International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) details the status of agricultural negotiations following the Doha Ministerial Declaration. It outlines the 'Doha Mandate' for market access, export subsidies, and domestic support, while highlighting the deep divisions between developed nations, the Cairns Group, and the Like-minded Group of developing countries regarding the implementation and definition of these commitments.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The Doha Mandate commits WTO Members to comprehensive negotiations focused on three primary goals: achieving substantial improvements in market access, reducing and phasing out all forms of export subsidies, and substantially reducing trade-distorting domestic support.
  • There is significant disagreement over the phase-out of export subsidies. While some exporters view the mandate as a commitment to elimination, the EU, Japan, Norway, and Switzerland argue that Members are only committed to 'working in the direction of' such elimination and have not agreed to a specific deadline.
  • Members are divided on the definition of 'trade-distorting domestic support.' The EU and Japan argue the mandate only applies to 'Amber Box' subsidies, whereas the Cairns Group and several developing countries contend that 'Green Box' spending—estimated at US$78 billion per year—distorts trade due to its volume and should be capped.
  • Two competing formulas for market access tariff reductions are being debated: a 'Swiss formula'-like approach, supported by the US and Cairns Group, which would cap all tariffs at 25 percent, and a linear 'Uruguay Round approach' proposed by the EU, India, and others, which applies the same percentage reduction regardless of the starting rate.
  • The 'Friends of Multifunctionality' (including the EU, Japan, Korea, Norway, Switzerland, and Mauritius) seek flexibility to use agricultural production to address non-trade concerns (NTCs) such as the environment, food security, and animal welfare.
  • Developing countries view the Doha language on special and differential treatment (S&D) as a commitment to make these provisions enforceable within the Agreement on Agriculture, moving beyond the 'best endeavour' language of the Marrakech Decision.
  • The agricultural negotiations were subject to several deadlines, including the agreement on modalities by 31 March 2003, the submission of comprehensive draft Schedules by the fifth WTO Ministerial Conference in September 2003, and the final conclusion of negotiations by 1 January 2005.

Cite the original document

APA
Baumuller, H., Cameron, H., Halle, A., Meléndez-Ortiz, R., Mosoti, V., Primack, D., Sugathan, M., Vivas, D., & Werth, A. (2003). Doha Mandate. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/wto_doha_agriculture.pdf
Chicago
Baumuller, Heike, Hugo Cameron, Anja Halle, Ricardo Meléndez-Ortiz, Victor Mosoti, David Primack, Mahesh Sugathan, David Vivas, and Alexander Werth. Doha Mandate. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2003. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/wto_doha_agriculture.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Baumuller |first1=Heike |last2=Cameron |first2=Hugo |last3=Halle |first3=Anja |last4=Meléndez-Ortiz |first4=Ricardo |last5=Mosoti |first5=Victor |last6=Primack |first6=David |last7=Sugathan |first7=Mahesh |last8=Vivas |first8=David |last9=Werth |first9=Alexander |title=Doha Mandate |publisher=International Institute for Sustainable Development |date=13 February 2003 |url=https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/wto_doha_agriculture.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{baumuller2003doha, author = {Baumuller, Heike and Cameron, Hugo and Halle, Anja and Meléndez-Ortiz, Ricardo and Mosoti, Victor and Primack, David and Sugathan, Mahesh and Vivas, David and Werth, Alexander}, title = {{Doha Mandate}}, institution = {International Institute for Sustainable Development}, year = {2003}, month = feb, url = {https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/wto_doha_agriculture.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated