SARHAD PROVINCE CONSERVATION STRATEGY INDICATORS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT SECTION 1 REPORT
Summary
The report identifies a significant gap between the environmental focus of the Sarhad Province Conservation Strategy (SPCS) and the immediate social priorities of local stakeholders, such as poverty and food security. It highlights critical deficiencies in data collection, noting a lack of systematic monitoring for water and air quality and the absence of provincial macroeconomic data. The author argues that the current centralized data system is inadequate for sustainable development monitoring and recommends a phased, decentralized approach using simple, action-oriented indicators to guide implementation.
Key insights
- Local policy priorities have shifted away from the environmental focus of the National and Sarhad Provincial Conservation Strategies toward urgent social issues. The most pressing concerns identified by stakeholders are poverty alleviation, food insecurity, and population growth control, with environment only becoming a priority when it directly impacts food security or causes catastrophic events.
- There is a critical lack of data necessary to measure sustainable development progress in the North West Frontier Province. Specifically, there are no government-run systematic monitoring networks for air quality, soil contamination, waste disposal, or surface and groundwater quality.
- Provincial macroeconomic performance cannot be accurately measured because the federal government monopolizes data on trade, financial services, and provincial GNP, preventing a provincial breakdown for political reasons.
- Data reliability is compromised by poor supervision and flawed collection methods. Examples include population growth anomalies caused by previous census guesses, unverified afforestation reports due to lack of field control, and under-reported television ownership due to fear of usage charges.
- The existing data collection system is hindered by excessive centralization and compartmentalization, which contradicts the decentralization goals of the SPCS. Furthermore, the use of English as the professional language makes the strategy inaccessible to the general public and local administration.
- The report recommends a phased implementation of the conservation strategy, treating it as a sustainable development strategy. It suggests using simple, action-oriented indicators that identify local problems and specific pockets of underdevelopment rather than relying on averages or high-level aggregation.
Cite the original document
- APA
- Hardi, P. (1998). SARHAD PROVINCE CONSERVATION STRATEGY INDICATORS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT SECTION 1 REPORT. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/pkrptsec1.pdf
- Chicago
- Hardi, Peter. SARHAD PROVINCE CONSERVATION STRATEGY INDICATORS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT SECTION 1 REPORT. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 1998. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/pkrptsec1.pdf.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |last1=Hardi |first1=Peter |title=SARHAD PROVINCE CONSERVATION STRATEGY INDICATORS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT SECTION 1 REPORT |publisher=International Institute for Sustainable Development |date=25 June 1998 |url=https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/pkrptsec1.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{hardi1998sarhad, author = {Hardi, Peter}, title = {{SARHAD PROVINCE CONSERVATION STRATEGY INDICATORS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT SECTION 1 REPORT}}, institution = {International Institute for Sustainable Development}, year = {1998}, month = jun, url = {https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/pkrptsec1.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated