Browse all documents

ОЦЕНКА РАМОЧНОЙ ПОЛИТИКИ МПФ В ОБЛАСТИ ГОРНОГО ДЕЛА

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This report provides an assessment of the Kyrgyz Republic's readiness and capacity to implement the Intergovernmental Forum on Mining, Minerals, Metals and Sustainable Development (IGF) Mining Policy Framework (MPF). Conducted between December 2017 and May 2018, the study analyzes national laws, policies, and administrative processes across six thematic areas: legal and policy framework, financial benefit optimization, socio-economic benefit optimization, environmental management, mine closure, and artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM). The assessment identifies strengths in the general tax regime and the existence of 'social packages' for communities, while highlighting critical gaps in outdated technical standards, unpredictable fiscal changes, and a lack of comprehensive mine closure regulations.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The legal and policy framework for mining in the Kyrgyz Republic is characterized by a mix of updated laws and outdated technical standards. While the Law on Subsoil is regularly updated to improve transparency and licensing, many technical instructions remain based on Soviet-era GOST standards, which the report describes as "устарели (поскольку многие стандарты и нормативы основаны на советских документах типа Госстандарт, или ГОСТ) и нуждаются в пересмотре с учетом передового опыта".
  • The fiscal regime is generally favorable but suffers from unpredictability and a lack of transparency in administration. Companies have expressed concern over the "продолжительное увеличение налоговых ставок и количества налогов, введенных с 2012 года", which contributes to uncertainty and potential corruption risks.
  • Socio-economic benefits are managed through 'social packages' and regional development funds, but these are often disconnected from formal impact assessments. The report notes that "Концепция комплексных экологических и социально-экономических оценок не получила широкого признания" and that the requirements for social packages are not clearly defined.
  • Environmental legislation covers basic aspects of water, waste, and biodiversity, but is hampered by contradictions and inconsistent application. The report states that "Природоохранное законодательство может ввести в заблуждение компании из-за имеющихся противоречий в законах и непостоянного характера применения стандартов".
  • Artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) is poorly regulated and largely decentralized, with minimal oversight from national ministries. The report highlights that "Деятельность КАД плохо регулируется на законодательном уровне" and that environmental, social, and health risks associated with this sector are not addressed in legislation.
  • The country faces significant legacy environmental issues from the Soviet era, particularly regarding uranium waste. There are "более 60 радиоактивных объектов — 36 хвостохранилищ и 25 мест захоронения урана" across the country, which the Ministry of Emergency Situations is working to remediate with international support.
  • Gender inequality persists in the mining sector due to labor laws that prohibit women from working in hazardous or underground conditions. The report mentions that "конкретные положения запрещают женщинам работать во вредных, опасных или тяжелых условиях, а также запрещают трудоустройство женщин для подземных работ".
  • The mining sector's contribution to the economy is heavily reliant on a single project, the Kumtor gold mine, which accounts for "почти 10 процентов ВВП страны". This creates significant economic risk as the mine is expected to complete production by 2026.
  • Public trust in mining projects is low, often leading to conflicts driven by environmental concerns. Research indicates that "более 90 процентов респондентов отметили экологические проблемы в качестве основной причины протеста против разработки полезных ископаемых".

Cite the original document

APA
Брукнер, К. Д., Даниелсон, Л., Лоуренс, П., Сыдыкова, А., Доолоткельдиева, А., & Блисс, М. (2018). ОЦЕНКА РАМОЧНОЙ ПОЛИТИКИ МПФ В ОБЛАСТИ ГОРНОГО ДЕЛА. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/kyrgyzstan-mining-policy-framework-assessment-ru.pdf
Chicago
Брукнер, Криси Дисней, Люк Даниелсон, Пол Лоуренс, Алтынай Сыдыкова, Асель Доолоткельдиева, and Мэтью Блисс. ОЦЕНКА РАМОЧНОЙ ПОЛИТИКИ МПФ В ОБЛАСТИ ГОРНОГО ДЕЛА. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2018. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/kyrgyzstan-mining-policy-framework-assessment-ru.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Брукнер |first1=Криси Дисней |last2=Даниелсон |first2=Люк |last3=Лоуренс |first3=Пол |last4=Сыдыкова |first4=Алтынай |last5=Доолоткельдиева |first5=Асель |last6=Блисс |first6=Мэтью |title=ОЦЕНКА РАМОЧНОЙ ПОЛИТИКИ МПФ В ОБЛАСТИ ГОРНОГО ДЕЛА |publisher=International Institute for Sustainable Development |date=September 2018 |url=https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/kyrgyzstan-mining-policy-framework-assessment-ru.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{2018, author = {Брукнер, Криси Дисней and Даниелсон, Люк and Лоуренс, Пол and Сыдыкова, Алтынай and Доолоткельдиева, Асель and Блисс, Мэтью}, title = {{ОЦЕНКА РАМОЧНОЙ ПОЛИТИКИ МПФ В ОБЛАСТИ ГОРНОГО ДЕЛА}}, institution = {International Institute for Sustainable Development}, year = {2018}, month = sep, url = {https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/kyrgyzstan-mining-policy-framework-assessment-ru.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated