ISO 14000 AND BUSINESS STRATEGY
Summary
This document is an annotated bibliography prepared for a 1996 conference in Beijing and the China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development. It summarizes various reports, articles, and books concerning the ISO 14000 series of environmental management standards and their implications for business strategy, international trade, and regulatory shifts.
Key insights
- ISO 14000 is widely viewed as a tool to reduce unintentional trade barriers caused by a proliferation of national environmental standards, though its ability to create a 'level playing field' is debated. Some argue it allows developing countries to improve performance at an achievable rate, while others suggest certification may be unattainable for them due to high costs and paperwork.
- A primary criticism of ISO 14001 is that it is a conformance standard rather than a performance standard, meaning it measures a company's adherence to its own environmental policy rather than requiring specific environmental output or performance levels.
- The standard is seen by many as a signal of a transition from 'command and control' government regulation toward a 'post-regulatory' era characterized by voluntary initiatives and industry self-regulation.
- Certification offers various internal and external benefits, including reduced environmental liability, improved operational efficiency, better investor confidence, and enhanced market access, particularly in Europe.
- There is significant discussion regarding the integration of ISO 14000 with other standards, such as ISO 9000 (quality management), ISO 20000 (health and safety), and the European Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS).
- The applicability of ISO 14000 to small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is contested; some believe the cost and effort are too high for SMEs, while others argue it provides a necessary framework for small businesses to manage complex guidelines.
- In the United States, the EPA and some state governments, such as Pennsylvania, have explored incorporating ISO 14000 into regulatory frameworks to potentially reduce inspections, permits, and penalties for certified companies.
- Multinational companies may face a 'double standard' under ISO 14001 because the standard requires compliance with the laws of the location of each facility rather than a single global corporate standard.
- The pulp and paper industry is specifically highlighted as a sector where ISO 14000 is critical for maintaining competitiveness in European markets and where life-cycle assessment (LCA) is of particular importance.
- The cost of certification can be substantial, with some estimates for SMEs ranging from $50,000 to $100,000 for initial certification, plus $25,000 annually per facility for maintenance.
Cite the original document
- APA
- Bertrand, V., & Conway, T. (1996). ISO 14000 AND BUSINESS STRATEGY. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/iso14bib.pdf
- Chicago
- Bertrand, Vivian, and Tom Conway. ISO 14000 AND BUSINESS STRATEGY. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 1996. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/iso14bib.pdf.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |last1=Bertrand |first1=Vivian |last2=Conway |first2=Tom |title=ISO 14000 AND BUSINESS STRATEGY |publisher=International Institute for Sustainable Development |date=October 1996 |url=https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/iso14bib.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{bertrand1996iso, author = {Bertrand, Vivian and Conway, Tom}, title = {{ISO 14000 AND BUSINESS STRATEGY}}, institution = {International Institute for Sustainable Development}, year = {1996}, month = oct, url = {https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/iso14bib.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated