Gestion des eaux minières : Études de cas de la Mongolie et du Chili

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document examines water governance in the mining sectors of Mongolia and Chile, advocating for a holistic, risk-based watershed approach. It details the legal frameworks, data collection strategies, and stakeholder engagement processes used in both jurisdictions to manage water scarcity and pollution risks, particularly in arid environments.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Effective watershed management requires a transition from basic data collection to a risk-based approach that integrates climate change scenarios and sensitivity analyses to ensure the sustainability of mitigation practices.
  • Mongolia has implemented a national Integrated Watershed Management Plan (IWMP) that categorizes management zones based on their dominant water source: surface water, combined surface and groundwater, or groundwater.
  • In Mongolia's Gobi Desert, mining activities rely on non-renewable fossil groundwater, and demand was projected to exceed supply by 2021, creating a high potential for conflict with livestock herders and local communities.
  • The Antofagasta region in Chile utilizes a strategic water resource plan (updated in 2016) that aligns regional goals with the national water strategy, focusing on social equity, citizen information, and the resolution of water shortages.
  • A significant governance challenge in Antofagasta is that water has been allocated as permanent rights without expiration dates rather than as time-limited permits, complicating the government's ability to manage resources effectively.
  • In the Loa River basin of Antofagasta, mining accounts for 60% of water demand, necessitating technical cost-benefit analyses based on environmental flows and ecosystem services to balance industrial use with indigenous and municipal rights.

Cite the original document

APA
Hill, J., & Gillman, M. (2021). Gestion des eaux minières : Études de cas de la Mongolie et du Chili. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2023-03/igf-case-study-mine-water-management-chile-mongolia-fr.pdf
Chicago
Hill, Jenifer, and Matthew Gillman. Gestion des eaux minières : Études de cas de la Mongolie et du Chili. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2021. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2023-03/igf-case-study-mine-water-management-chile-mongolia-fr.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Hill |first1=Jenifer |last2=Gillman |first2=Matthew |title=Gestion des eaux minières : Études de cas de la Mongolie et du Chili |publisher=International Institute for Sustainable Development |date=2021 |url=https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2023-03/igf-case-study-mine-water-management-chile-mongolia-fr.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{hill2021gestion, author = {Hill, Jenifer and Gillman, Matthew}, title = {{Gestion des eaux minières : Études de cas de la Mongolie et du Chili}}, institution = {International Institute for Sustainable Development}, year = {2021}, url = {https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2023-03/igf-case-study-mine-water-management-chile-mongolia-fr.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated