Browse all documents

Mine Water Management: Case Studies from Mongolia and Chile

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

This case study by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) examines watershed-level water management frameworks in Mongolia and the Antofagasta region of Chile, focusing on the intersection of mining activities and water security in arid environments.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Effective watershed-level management requires a risk-based approach that incorporates climate change scenarios and sensitivity analyses to address biophysical, socio-economic, and regulatory risks.
  • Mongolia implemented an Integrated Watershed Management Plan (IWMP) in 2013 that categorizes the country into three management zones based on water type: surface water, surface and groundwater, and groundwater-dominated areas.
  • In Mongolia's Gobi Desert, groundwater is considered non-renewable fossil water, and mining demand is predicted to exceed supply in 2021, creating potential conflict with herders and local communities.
  • The Antofagasta region in Chile manages 10 watersheds across 127,221 km2, with a strategic plan updated in 2016 that includes citizen consultation via workshops in six communities.
  • A significant governance challenge in Chile is that water was historically allocated as rights with no expiry date rather than as licenses, which complicates effective resource management.
  • In the Loa River watershed of Antofagasta, mining accounts for 60% of the water demand, necessitating a balance between industrial use and the rights of Indigenous communities and municipalities.
  • The 'Plan Chile 30/30' initiative, based on consultations with over 10,000 participants, aims for 2030 goals including decentralized coordination, standardized data collection, and strengthened enforcement of the Water Code.

Cite the original document

APA
Hill, J., & Gillman, M. (2021). Mine Water Management: Case Studies from Mongolia and Chile. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2021-12/igf-case-study-mine-water-management-chile-mongolia.pdf
Chicago
Hill, Jenifer, and Matthew Gillman. Mine Water Management: Case Studies from Mongolia and Chile. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2021. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2021-12/igf-case-study-mine-water-management-chile-mongolia.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Hill |first1=Jenifer |last2=Gillman |first2=Matthew |title=Mine Water Management: Case Studies from Mongolia and Chile |publisher=International Institute for Sustainable Development |date=2021 |url=https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2021-12/igf-case-study-mine-water-management-chile-mongolia.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{hill2021mine, author = {Hill, Jenifer and Gillman, Matthew}, title = {{Mine Water Management: Case Studies from Mongolia and Chile}}, institution = {International Institute for Sustainable Development}, year = {2021}, url = {https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2021-12/igf-case-study-mine-water-management-chile-mongolia.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated