Mine Water Management: Case Studies from Mongolia and Chile

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The report outlines a holistic approach to watershed-level water management, emphasizing the need for risk-based planning, stakeholder engagement, and clear legal frameworks. It presents case studies from Mongolia, which utilizes a system of management zones based on water sources, and Antofagasta, Chile, which employs strategic regional planning and technical cost-benefit analyses. Both jurisdictions highlight the challenges of managing water in arid environments where mining competes with community and agricultural needs, particularly under the pressures of climate change.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Effective watershed management requires a risk-based approach that incorporates climate change scenarios and sensitivity analyses to address biophysical, socio-economic, and regulatory risks.
  • Mongolia's 2013 Integrated Watershed Management Plan (IWMP) categorizes the country into three management zones based on water type: surface water, surface and groundwater, and groundwater-dominated areas.
  • In Mongolia's Gobi Desert, groundwater is considered non-renewable fossil water, and mining demand was predicted to exceed supply in 2021.
  • Mongolia is implementing a digital water platform that integrates monitoring data with machine learning and artificial intelligence to improve predictive modelling for water allocation.
  • In Antofagasta, Chile, mining accounts for 60% of the water demand within the Loa River watershed, necessitating a balance with the rights of Indigenous communities and agricultural needs.
  • A significant governance challenge in Chile is that water was historically allocated as rights with no expiry date rather than as licenses.
  • Chile's 'Plan Chile 30/30' initiative, based on consultations with over 10,000 participants, aims to improve water security and minimize risks from natural disasters and climate change by 2030.

Cite the original document

APA
Hill, J., & Gillman, M. (2021). Mine Water Management: Case Studies from Mongolia and Chile. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2021-12/igf-case-study-mine-water-management-chile-mongolia.pdf
Chicago
Hill, Jenifer, and Matthew Gillman. Mine Water Management: Case Studies from Mongolia and Chile. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2021. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2021-12/igf-case-study-mine-water-management-chile-mongolia.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Hill |first1=Jenifer |last2=Gillman |first2=Matthew |title=Mine Water Management: Case Studies from Mongolia and Chile |publisher=International Institute for Sustainable Development |date=2021 |url=https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2021-12/igf-case-study-mine-water-management-chile-mongolia.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{hill2021mine, author = {Hill, Jenifer and Gillman, Matthew}, title = {{Mine Water Management: Case Studies from Mongolia and Chile}}, institution = {International Institute for Sustainable Development}, year = {2021}, url = {https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2021-12/igf-case-study-mine-water-management-chile-mongolia.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated