Comparative Analysis of the Existing Criteria, Principles, and Safeguards for the Implementation of Nature-Based Solutions

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document analyzes the compatibility between the IUCN Global Standard for NbS and the CBD Voluntary Guidelines, concluding that both are effective for scaling up nature-based solutions. It emphasizes the need for clarity on transferring global frameworks to local contexts and suggests that upcoming reviews of these standards should align with UNEA Resolution 5/5 to avoid duplication of effort.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The IUCN Global Standard on NbS and the CBD Voluntary Guidelines are found to be highly compatible and effective for the implementation and scaling of nature-based solutions.
  • There is a requirement for greater clarity regarding the specific guidance needed to implement NbS and the methods for translating global frameworks into local applications, with a priority on avoiding duplication of work.
  • Planned updates to the CBD Voluntary Guidelines and the IUCN Global Standard provide an opportunity to align with United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA) Resolution 5/5 and prevent overlapping work within the UNEA and United Nations Environment Programme.
  • Nature-based solutions are being integrated into national policies, such as nationally determined contributions, national adaptation plans, and national biodiversity strategies and action plans, and are explicitly included in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework targets.

Cite the original document

APA
Terton,, J. Q. (2025). Comparative Analysis of the Existing Criteria, Principles, and Safeguards for the Implementation of Nature-Based Solutions. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/publications/report/comparative-analysis-nature-based-solutions
Chicago
Terton,, Jeffrey Qi,Anika. Comparative Analysis of the Existing Criteria, Principles, and Safeguards for the Implementation of Nature-Based Solutions. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2025. https://www.iisd.org/publications/report/comparative-analysis-nature-based-solutions.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Terton, |first1=Jeffrey Qi,Anika |title=Comparative Analysis of the Existing Criteria, Principles, and Safeguards for the Implementation of Nature-Based Solutions |publisher=International Institute for Sustainable Development |date=6 May 2025 |url=https://www.iisd.org/publications/report/comparative-analysis-nature-based-solutions |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{terton2025comparative, author = {Terton,, Jeffrey Qi,Anika}, title = {{Comparative Analysis of the Existing Criteria, Principles, and Safeguards for the Implementation of Nature-Based Solutions}}, institution = {International Institute for Sustainable Development}, year = {2025}, month = may, url = {https://www.iisd.org/publications/report/comparative-analysis-nature-based-solutions}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated