Co-designing resilient urban communities: The power of human capital in inclusive public engagement
Summary
This policy brief by GreenCape examines the human capital requirements for successful participatory co-design in urban communities, specifically focusing on building resilience in informal settlements in Cape Town. It argues that the success of community-led service delivery depends on 'project drivers'—facilitators who possess specific core values, personality traits, and professional skills to navigate complex social dynamics and bridge education and language gaps.
Key insights
- Urban resilience requires moving beyond superficial public engagement toward meaningful involvement in civic decision-making to help stakeholders adapt to climate change, population growth, and inequity.
- Asset-based community development empowers underdeveloped or poor communities to identify their own problems and solutions by investing in existing local resources, which then become capital for resilient development.
- The Alternative Service Delivery Unit (ASDU) employs a four-step participatory co-design process: community mapping and 'snowball' engagements, direct community leadership engagements, mobilisation and enumeration, and community-led co-design.
- In the informal settlements of Freedom Farm and Malawi Camp, the ASDU process led the community to prioritise home-level lighting and connectivity, resulting in the selection of a home-solar system funded by the landowner and maintained by a local company employing community members.
- Successful 'project drivers' must possess five core values: trust, collaboration, resilience, hope, and diversity and inclusion, which serve as the foundation for meaningful community engagement.
- Essential skills for project drivers include active facilitation to encourage quieter stakeholders, active listening to grasp implicit meanings, interpersonal skills for conflict resolution, and creative thinking to adapt methodologies to the local context.
- Common pitfalls in community participation include underestimating required financial, temporal, and human resources, insufficient training in facilitation, lack of clear rules, and involving stakeholders too late in the process.
Cite the original document
- APA
- GreenCape (n.d.). Co-designing resilient urban communities: The power of human capital in inclusive public engagement. https://greencape.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/CO-DESIGNING_RESILIENT_URBAN_COMMUNITIES_REPORT_2_7-3.pdf
- Chicago
- GreenCape. Co-designing resilient urban communities: The power of human capital in inclusive public engagement. n.d. https://greencape.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/CO-DESIGNING_RESILIENT_URBAN_COMMUNITIES_REPORT_2_7-3.pdf.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |author=GreenCape |title=Co-designing resilient urban communities: The power of human capital in inclusive public engagement |url=https://greencape.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/CO-DESIGNING_RESILIENT_URBAN_COMMUNITIES_REPORT_2_7-3.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{greencapendcodesigning, author = {{GreenCape}}, title = {{Co-designing resilient urban communities: The power of human capital in inclusive public engagement}}, institution = {GreenCape}, url = {https://greencape.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/CO-DESIGNING_RESILIENT_URBAN_COMMUNITIES_REPORT_2_7-3.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated