Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

ENTSOG denies that its role in the Ten Year Network Development Plan (TYNDP) creates a conflict of interest or undermines EU climate goals. It asserts that the European Commission, National Regulatory Authorities, and ACER maintain final decision-making power over PCI selection. ENTSOG highlights that its TYNDP 2020 process now includes 'Energy Transition Related projects' and that its scenario-building is increasingly integrated with ENTSO-E to reflect decarbonisation targets.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • ENTSOG argues that the PCI selection process is structured to prevent conflicts of interest, stating that it merely facilitates information collection and acts as an expert, while the European Commission, National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs), and Member States make the final decisions.
  • Regarding gas demand forecasts, ENTSOG states that it does not estimate future demand specifically for assessing PCI projects, but instead develops holistic energy system scenarios jointly with ENTSO-E that incorporate National Energy and Climate Development Plans (NECPs) and COP21 compliant carbon budgets.
  • ENTSOG acknowledges a trend of improving its scenario accuracy and notes that the TYNDP 2020 now includes 'Energy Transition Related projects' for the first time, which account for approximately one fifth of the projects submitted to the process so far.
  • ENTSOG denies exerting power over the vetting of PCIs, claiming it participates in regional groups only as an observer and that its cost-benefit analysis methodology is approved by the European Commission after review by ACER.

Cite the original document

APA
Global Witness (2020). Global Witness queries_ENTSOG responses. https://gw.cdn.ngo/media/documents/200605_-_ENTSOG_Response_to_Global_Witness_iNUi2Wo.pdf
Chicago
Global Witness. Global Witness queries_ENTSOG responses. 2020. https://gw.cdn.ngo/media/documents/200605_-_ENTSOG_Response_to_Global_Witness_iNUi2Wo.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |author=Global Witness |title=Global Witness queries_ENTSOG responses |date=5 June 2020 |url=https://gw.cdn.ngo/media/documents/200605_-_ENTSOG_Response_to_Global_Witness_iNUi2Wo.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{globalwitness2020global, author = {{Global Witness}}, title = {{Global Witness queries\_ENTSOG responses}}, publisher = {Global Witness}, year = {2020}, month = jun, url = {https://gw.cdn.ngo/media/documents/200605_-_ENTSOG_Response_to_Global_Witness_iNUi2Wo.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated