EITI should do better to protect civic space: why and how

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The briefing asserts that shrinking civic space globally threatens the effectiveness and legitimacy of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). While EITI possesses a framework of tools—including the 'Protocol: Participation of civil society' and Requirement 1.3 of the 2023 Standard—the document argues these are often underutilized due to a lack of political will or knowledge. It calls for making the monitoring of civic space mandatory for multi-stakeholder groups (MSGs) and urges the EITI International Board and Secretariat to move from general commitments to concrete, time-bound actions, specifically targeting the June 2026 Global Conference in the Philippines.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The extractive sector is linked to the highest number of attacks against human rights defenders over the last ten years, a situation exacerbated by accelerated permitting and licensing for mineral extraction.
  • EITI's success depends on a robust civic space; without it, the multi-stakeholder process cannot function, and the initiative risks losing its efficiency, legitimacy, and credibility.
  • Existing EITI tools to protect civic space—such as 'voicing a concern' mechanisms, Board statements, and the potential for full de-listing—are often used reactively rather than preventatively due to insufficient political will or knowledge.
  • There is a perception among civil society that the EITI International Secretariat sometimes prioritizes political expediency over the protection of civic space.
  • The briefing recommends making the monitoring of civic space mandatory for multi-stakeholder groups (MSGs) by revising EITI requirement #1.3(f), requiring a dedicated agenda item at least quarterly.

Cite the original document

APA
Salomon, M., Omarov, E., Stewart, E. I., Ramos, M., Avan, C., & Moore, C. (2026). EITI should do better to protect civic space: why and how. Global Witness. https://globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/transition-minerals/eiti-should-do-better-to-protect-civic-space-why-and-how/
Chicago
Salomon, Matthieu, Emil Omarov, Emily Iona Stewart, Maria Ramos, Caroline Avan, and Clancy Moore. EITI should do better to protect civic space: why and how. Global Witness, 2026. https://globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/transition-minerals/eiti-should-do-better-to-protect-civic-space-why-and-how/.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Salomon |first1=Matthieu |last2=Omarov |first2=Emil |last3=Stewart |first3=Emily Iona |last4=Ramos |first4=Maria |last5=Avan |first5=Caroline |last6=Moore |first6=Clancy |title=EITI should do better to protect civic space: why and how |publisher=Global Witness |date=24 March 2026 |url=https://globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/transition-minerals/eiti-should-do-better-to-protect-civic-space-why-and-how/ |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{salomon2026eiti, author = {Salomon, Matthieu and Omarov, Emil and Stewart, Emily Iona and Ramos, Maria and Avan, Caroline and Moore, Clancy}, title = {{EITI should do better to protect civic space: why and how}}, institution = {Global Witness}, year = {2026}, month = mar, url = {https://globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/transition-minerals/eiti-should-do-better-to-protect-civic-space-why-and-how/}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated