Первоначальные руководящие рамки процесса аккредитации фонда GCF

The GCF's initial guiding framework for accreditation integrates fiduciary principles and environmental and social safeguards (ESS) into a three-stage process. It distinguishes between basic and specialized fiduciary criteria and utilizes a risk-based approach for environmental and social screening. The process involves a sequence of readiness assessments, institutional reviews, and final legal arrangements, overseen by the GCF Board, Secretariat, and an independent Accreditation Panel.

• The GCF accreditation process is structured into three primary stages: Stage I focuses on 'no-objections and readiness', Stage II involves the 'review of the accreditation application and decision', and Stage III covers 'final arrangements'.
• Fiduciary standards are divided into basic criteria, covering general management, financial accounting, audit, and anti-money laundering, and specialized criteria for project management, grant awarding, and on-lending or blended finance.
• The GCF will temporarily adopt the International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability, with the goal of developing its own safeguards within three years of becoming operational.
• Environmental and social risks are managed via a proportional risk-oriented approach, categorizing projects into Category A (significant adverse risks), Category B (moderate adverse risks), and Category C (minimal or zero adverse risks).
• The accreditation process differs by access type: 'direct access' for subnational, national, and regional entities requires a no-objection letter and readiness assessment, while 'international access' for entities like UN agencies and multilateral development banks requires only an institutional assessment.
• Accreditation is not permanent and is subject to review every five years based on the entity's performance during that cycle.
• The governance of the process is shared among the Board (highest decision-making body), the Secretariat (operational implementation), the Accreditation Committee (guidance), and the Accreditation Panel (independent review and recommendation).

APA

Green Climate Fund (n.d.). Первоначальные руководящие рамки процесса аккредитации фонда GCF. https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/document/ru-initial-guiding-framework-accreditation.pdf

Chicago

Green Climate Fund. Первоначальные руководящие рамки процесса аккредитации фонда GCF. n.d. https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/document/ru-initial-guiding-framework-accreditation.pdf.

Wikipedia

{{cite report |author=Green Climate Fund |title=Первоначальные руководящие рамки процесса аккредитации фонда GCF |url=https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/document/ru-initial-guiding-framework-accreditation.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}

BibTeX

@techreport{greenclimatefundndgcf, author = {{Green Climate Fund}}, title = {{Первоначальные руководящие рамки процесса аккредитации фонда GCF}}, institution = {Green Climate Fund}, url = {https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/document/ru-initial-guiding-framework-accreditation.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }