MANUAL DE RESULTADOS DEL MIGR

The manual outlines the GCF's Integrated Results Management Framework (IRMF), a system designed for accountability and learning across its investment portfolio. It details the processes for measuring paradigm shifts, mitigation, adaptation, and enabling environments using a combination of quantitative indicators and qualitative scorecards. The guide specifies the roles of Accredited Entities (AEs), the GCF Secretariat, and independent evaluators in implementing Theory of Change (ToC) and logical frameworks, as well as the requirements for annual reporting and mid-term and final evaluations.

• The IRMF, approved in July 2021, replaces the initial Results Management Framework (RMF) and the Mitigation and Adaptation Performance Measurement Frameworks (MPMF).
• Paradigm shift is measured across three dimensions: scale, replicability, and sustainability, using a three-point scoring scale.
• The GCF utilizes four core quantitative indicators for mitigation and adaptation: GHG emissions reduced, avoided, or removed (Indicator 1); reach of direct and indirect beneficiaries (Indicator 2); value of physical assets made more resilient or lower-emission (Indicator 3); and hectares of natural resource areas under improved management (Indicator 4).
• Contributions to enabling environments are measured by four core indicators focusing on institutional/regulatory frameworks, technology transfer/innovation, market transformation, and knowledge generation/learning.
• Every GCF funding proposal must include a Theory of Change (ToC) and a logical framework to define how the project will be monitored and evaluated.
• Accredited Entities (AEs) are primarily responsible for designing the ToC and logical frameworks, establishing baselines, and submitting Annual Results Reports (ARRs).
• Annual Results Reports (ARRs) must be submitted online via the Portfolio Performance Management System (PPMS), typically by March 1st each year.
• Independent evaluations are required twice during project implementation: a mid-term evaluation and a final evaluation.
• The GCF defines 'co-benefits' as additional or secondary benefits resulting from mitigation or adaptation activities, which can include environmental, social, economic, and gender benefits.
• Budget for monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) is generally proportional to project size, with evaluation budgets typically ranging between 2% and 5% of the total project budget.

APA

Green Climate Fund (n.d.). MANUAL DE RESULTADOS DEL MIGR. https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/document/results-handbook-esp-final.pdf

Chicago

Green Climate Fund. MANUAL DE RESULTADOS DEL MIGR. n.d. https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/document/results-handbook-esp-final.pdf.

Wikipedia

{{cite report |author=Green Climate Fund |title=MANUAL DE RESULTADOS DEL MIGR |url=https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/document/results-handbook-esp-final.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}

BibTeX

@techreport{greenclimatefundndmanual, author = {{Green Climate Fund}}, title = {{MANUAL DE RESULTADOS DEL MIGR}}, institution = {Green Climate Fund}, url = {https://www.greenclimate.fund/sites/default/files/document/results-handbook-esp-final.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }