FSD Africa: Jobs Framework Methodology Paper
Summary
The FSD Africa Jobs Framework provides a systematic approach to measuring employment effects by linking financial sector innovations to real economy outcomes. It focuses on gross job creation across micro (firm) and meso (sector) levels, using a 'Decent Jobs Assessment' to evaluate job quality, inclusion, and geographic need. The framework emphasizes a contribution-based approach rather than strict attribution, utilizing investment multipliers and sector-based proxies to estimate impact while avoiding macro-level induced effects.
Key insights
- The framework employs a four-step process: linking interventions to job effects, estimating total jobs created and supported, assessing job decency, and performing deep-dive verifications.
- FSD Africa focuses on gross job creation rather than net job creation because estimating net effects is hindered by difficulties in measuring displacement, substitution, and deadweight.
- Employment effects are measured at two primary levels: micro-level (new jobs in direct real economy beneficiary firms) and meso-level (jobs supported in the wider supply chain using multipliers).
- Macro-level induced employment effects, resulting from increased consumer spending, are explicitly excluded from the current framework due to their short-run duration and potential for inflationary effects.
- The 'Decent Jobs Assessment' scores projects out of 100 based on three dimensions: job quality (earnings, security, employability), inclusion (gender and vulnerable groups), and geography (national-level SDG indicators).
- FSD Africa uses a 'contribution share' based on pro-rating capital invested or support provided, rather than claiming full attribution of all jobs created by an enterprise.
- The framework utilizes Full-Time Equivalents (FTE) for calculations, based on a standard of 240 working days per year.
- To validate aggregate data, the framework offers four 'deep dive' options: Value Chains for Jobs Estimation (VCJ), Economic Impact Assessments (EIA), case studies, and Lean Data Surveys.
- Income effects are measured and reported separately from employment effects because they use different metrics (headcount for income vs. FTE for employment) and serve different conceptual goals.
Cite the original document
- APA
- Ripley, M., & Davies, G. (2020). FSD Africa: Jobs Framework Methodology Paper. FSD Africa. https://fsdafrica.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/21-01-15-FSD-Africa-Jobs-Framework.pdf
- Chicago
- Ripley, Matt, and Gareth Davies. FSD Africa: Jobs Framework Methodology Paper. FSD Africa, 2020. https://fsdafrica.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/21-01-15-FSD-Africa-Jobs-Framework.pdf.
- Wikipedia
- {{cite report |last1=Ripley |first1=Matt |last2=Davies |first2=Gareth |title=FSD Africa: Jobs Framework Methodology Paper |publisher=FSD Africa |date=December 2020 |url=https://fsdafrica.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/21-01-15-FSD-Africa-Jobs-Framework.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
- BibTeX
- @techreport{ripley2020fsd, author = {Ripley, Matt and Davies, Gareth}, title = {{FSD Africa: Jobs Framework Methodology Paper}}, institution = {FSD Africa}, year = {2020}, month = dec, url = {https://fsdafrica.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/21-01-15-FSD-Africa-Jobs-Framework.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }
Full text
Collected · Record updated