Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The report finds that most of the 21 analysed European power utilities are failing to align their strategies with IEA Net Zero benchmarks. Only 43% have coal phase-out plans aligned with the 2030 EU/OECD target, and 100% are expected to operate fossil gas plants in EU/OECD countries beyond 2035. While total wind and solar capacity is projected to quadruple by 2030, this falls short of the required six-fold growth, and only 10% of companies are on track to achieve that minimum. The report highlights a lack of transparency regarding fossil gas and warns against speculative 'hydrogen-ready' claims used to justify continued fossil fuel use.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Only nine (43%) of the 21 analysed coal utilities have aligned their coal phase-out dates with the IEA benchmarks of 2030 for EU/OECD countries and 2040 for the rest of the world.
  • Six of the assessed utilities are not compliant even with the 2040 global coal phase-out deadline: Enea, Fortum/Uniper, PGE, Sev.En, STEAG, and Tauron.
  • There is a total lack of transparency regarding fossil gas, and based on available data, all 21 assessed utilities will continue operating fossil gas power plants in EU/OECD countries beyond the 2035 benchmark.
  • The combined wind and solar capacity of the 21 companies is projected to grow from 88 GW in 2020 to 428 GW by 2030, which is a quadrupling of capacity but fails to meet the IEA's required six-fold growth.
  • Only two companies (10%) are projected to grow their wind and solar portfolios by more than six-fold, and only four (19%) will triple their production using these technologies.
  • Hydrogen plans are currently insufficient to replace fossil gas generation, and the report warns that 'hydrogen-ready' claims may be used to justify the continued operation of fossil gas plants.
  • A contradiction exists where the utilities most active in wind and solar investment are also those planning to maintain extensive fossil fuel fleets beyond 2035.
  • Some utilities rely heavily on biomass, which the report notes is often not carbon neutral and can be a worse polluter than coal; Drax and Ørsted have the largest operational biomass fleets.

Cite the original document

APA
Brown, S., & Kolle, K. (2022). Limited Utility. Ember. https://ember-energy.org/app/uploads/2024/10/Limited-Utility.pdf
Chicago
Brown, Sarah, and Kaarina Kolle. Limited Utility. Ember, 2022. https://ember-energy.org/app/uploads/2024/10/Limited-Utility.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Brown |first1=Sarah |last2=Kolle |first2=Kaarina |title=Limited Utility |publisher=Ember |date=January 2022 |url=https://ember-energy.org/app/uploads/2024/10/Limited-Utility.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{brown2022limited, author = {Brown, Sarah and Kolle, Kaarina}, title = {{Limited Utility}}, institution = {Ember}, year = {2022}, month = jan, url = {https://ember-energy.org/app/uploads/2024/10/Limited-Utility.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated