Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

A coalition of organizations advocates for Georgia to prioritize energy efficiency to meet Clean Power Plan goals, arguing that such measures are the cheapest way to reduce emissions while supporting local job growth and reducing consumer costs. The letter suggests that a combination of energy-savings targets, updated building codes, and combined heat and power could meet 73 percent of the state's 2030 compliance goal, potentially saving Georgians $1.9 billion and avoiding 12 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • Energy efficiency is presented as the most economical demand-side resource, being less expensive than renewables or electric and gas generation. It is described as the only option that simultaneously reduces emissions, lowers the cost of Clean Power Plan implementation, and creates sustained local employment.
  • The document identifies several non-utility administered energy-efficiency opportunities for Georgia, including the use of energy savings performance contracts (ESPCs), residential retrofit financing, combined heat and power, and the adoption of building energy codes with green building certification. The U.S. ESPC market is noted to generate over $5 billion in new annual investments.
  • According to an attached fact sheet, implementing specific policies such as updated building energy codes, combined heat and power, and energy-savings targets could allow Georgia to meet 73 percent of its 2030 compliance goal under the Clean Power Plan. This approach would avoid 12 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions and save Georgia residents $1.9 billion.

Cite the original document

APA
Environmental and Energy Study Institute (2016). georgia_cpp_letter_3.2.16-25826315c90474a0.pdf. https://www.eesi.org/files/Georgia_CPP_Letter_3.2.16.pdf
Chicago
Environmental and Energy Study Institute. georgia_cpp_letter_3.2.16-25826315c90474a0.pdf. 2016. https://www.eesi.org/files/Georgia_CPP_Letter_3.2.16.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite press release |author=Environmental and Energy Study Institute |title=georgia_cpp_letter_3.2.16-25826315c90474a0.pdf |date=2 March 2016 |url=https://www.eesi.org/files/Georgia_CPP_Letter_3.2.16.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@misc{environmentalandenergystudyinstitute2016georgiacppletter321625826315c90474a0pdf, author = {{Environmental and Energy Study Institute}}, title = {{georgia\_cpp\_letter\_3.2.16-25826315c90474a0.pdf}}, publisher = {Environmental and Energy Study Institute}, year = {2016}, month = mar, url = {https://www.eesi.org/files/Georgia_CPP_Letter_3.2.16.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated