Reconciling CORSIA and the Sustainable Development Mechanism

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document proposes replacing traditional carbon offsetting with a results-based climate finance (RBCF) system under a unified Sustainable Development Mechanism (SDM). It argues that while the aviation sector currently relies on offsets via CORSIA, this should be a transitory arrangement phased out by 2030 through a 'ratchet mechanism' on Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) scope. To ensure environmental integrity and avoid double counting, the author recommends a 50% discount rate on offsets, mandatory corresponding adjustments by host countries, and a transparent international registry. Additionally, the SDM should incorporate stakeholder consultation rules, grievance mechanisms, and restrictions on harmful technologies like coal to foster genuine sustainable development.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • To phase out aviation's reliance on offsetting by 2030, the SDM should implement a ratchet mechanism where offsets can only be issued from sectors newly included in a country's NDC for a maximum of five years.
  • To achieve overall global emission reductions, a 50% discount rate should be applied to offsets used under the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA), meaning 5 of every 10 credits purchased must be cancelled immediately.
  • To prevent double counting, host countries must perform a corresponding adjustment by increasing their emissions account when selling an offset, and all such transfers must be authorized by the host country.
  • The SDM requires a centralized, publicly accessible international registry to track the issuance, transfer, use, and cancellation of mitigation outcomes to ensure transparency and environmental integrity.
  • To ensure sustainable development and avoid harm, the SDM should implement local stakeholder consultation rules, a grievance mechanism, and technology restrictions to exclude projects such as coal power plants.

Cite the original document

APA
Dufrasne, G. (2018). Reconciling CORSIA and the Sustainable Development Mechanism. Carbon Market Watch. https://carbonmarketwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CMW-PB-RECONCILING-CORSIA-AND-THE-SUSTAINABLE-DEVELOPMENT-MECHANISM-FINAL-SINGLE-PAGE-WEB.pdf
Chicago
Dufrasne, Gilles. Reconciling CORSIA and the Sustainable Development Mechanism. Carbon Market Watch, 2018. https://carbonmarketwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CMW-PB-RECONCILING-CORSIA-AND-THE-SUSTAINABLE-DEVELOPMENT-MECHANISM-FINAL-SINGLE-PAGE-WEB.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Dufrasne |first1=Gilles |title=Reconciling CORSIA and the Sustainable Development Mechanism |publisher=Carbon Market Watch |date=August 2018 |url=https://carbonmarketwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CMW-PB-RECONCILING-CORSIA-AND-THE-SUSTAINABLE-DEVELOPMENT-MECHANISM-FINAL-SINGLE-PAGE-WEB.pdf |access-date=23 October 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{dufrasne2018reconciling, author = {Dufrasne, Gilles}, title = {{Reconciling CORSIA and the Sustainable Development Mechanism}}, institution = {Carbon Market Watch}, year = {2018}, month = aug, url = {https://carbonmarketwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/CMW-PB-RECONCILING-CORSIA-AND-THE-SUSTAINABLE-DEVELOPMENT-MECHANISM-FINAL-SINGLE-PAGE-WEB.pdf}, urldate = {2026-10-23}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated